terrynew said:
But he has answered the question when he said: Yes I would mind, alot of it is theoretical and I wouldn't like to post something I am not 100% on myself. For MY OWN use I am doing some research on minimising the bearing wear and its failure based on cases available on the net. So why cant you respect his answer.
I see I am funny and in denial better go so see the doc. All the people replying that there is an issue and showing findings of other people and other forums posts but no one is saying conclusively what their finding is is and what is the cause.is.I am not bothered about results in other countries but only in South Africa. See what the figure of E90/E92/93 sales were in South Africa and what the failure rate of bearings in South Africa is . If the failure rate is in the majority then we definitely got a problem.
I have nothing against people giving advice but please dont try and force it upon other people.
If one does not have a good understanding of something, then I agree it makes absolute sense not to try and explain it when one risks failing to do so adequately. However, it is not cogent to then vehemently put forward the aforementioned as fact, and use it as a counter argument to other points in a discussion. That would simply be like saying " I really have a good counter argument to your point, but Im not going to say it because i don't understand it".
Anyway, you've made it clear that you do not believe the risk of bearing failure on your engine is high enough to warrant preventative action. You are quite entitled to adopt that position in this discussion, however it has also been quite adequately argued, with many supporting references (extensive links etc) that bearing failures DO happen. It is a world wide noted trend, both overseas AND in South Africa, that all the high revving S engines (S54, S65, & S85) experience premature and/or catastrophic bearing failure.
I think it can be agreed that in the specific case of the S65, it is not known exactly when, and under what circumstances bearing failure will occur, and thus it remains difficult to predict exactly when the risk increases to a point where it is worthwhile to take preventative action. Every engine experiences a different life, and there is not yet a consensus of what the mileage interval of highest risk is. If one considers the anecdotal evidence of local shops, I would argue that it has happened frequently enough to be considered a credible risk. Lets use the fact that Tune Tech are regularly rebuilding engines due to this issue.
Whether you or the OP consider it risky to run the engine over 100 000km without taking preventative action is purely a function of your personal risk profile, and your personal belief in the extent that this issue exists. I believe that there is sufficient evidence to suggest the risk is notable, and as these engines age I believe that more and more evidence will present itself, as was the case with the S54 (no one seems to doubt that bearings are an issue on these engines anymore).
In conclusion, no one is forcing advice on anyone. Most of the contributors to this thread have made astute arguments as to the fact that risk of bearing failure exists albeit within relatively unknown parameters, with the common piece of advice being to address it in a preventative manner to as to avoid a substantially larger repair in the future. If you think your engine will be fine, then you are wiling to accept the risk of inaction.