Redline
Member
Legacy said:markbsimon said:Legacy said:That does look familiar :fencelook:
I don't agree with it being the last true M car. The E46 M3 has it outclassed in every possible way except maybe rear legroom :biglol:
But it was not hand built it was a mass produced factory item that had some extras added. As I said th3 E34 was the last Handbuilt M car with personal attention to detail. And as for the desicion to mass produce for commercial reasons I still believe the whole point of an M car is that it is special a limited edition and if you (BMW) chose to mass produce they should have given it a different insignia so as not to deminish the value of what the "M" stands for.
I don't think because it is hand built it automatically a better car. The E34 M5 has some problems which the E46 and some other M cars don't. Key among is the 540i/6. The 540i/6 is more rare than the M5 (72(5) 540i's vs 265 M5's), it is more economical (strange but true) and has almost identical handling prowess. If the M5 has "hardness and uncompromising super performance" that you speak of the 540i/6 has it as well.
MMMMMMMMM
I beg to differ if I recall a 540/6 test I read the 540 had the same suspension as the auto. I have driven a E34540 & owned a E34 M5. The handling & braking of the M is, to my mind, far superior.
Also I found my old M5 to have better consumption than my E39 540, which I understand is lighter than the E34 540
Fordkoppie,
Since you have an example of each your input please?
 
				 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		