Legacy
///Member
rick540 said:Legacy said:markbsimon said:Legacy said:That does look familiar :fencelook:
I don't agree with it being the last true M car. The E46 M3 has it outclassed in every possible way except maybe rear legroom :biglol:
But it was not hand built it was a mass produced factory item that had some extras added. As I said th3 E34 was the last Handbuilt M car with personal attention to detail. And as for the desicion to mass produce for commercial reasons I still believe the whole point of an M car is that it is special a limited edition and if you (BMW) chose to mass produce they should have given it a different insignia so as not to deminish the value of what the "M" stands for.
I don't think because it is hand built it automatically a better car. The E34 M5 has some problems which the E46 and some other M cars don't. Key among is the 540i/6. The 540i/6 is more rare than the M5 (72(5) 540i's vs 265 M5's), it is more economical (strange but true) and has almost identical handling prowess. If the M5 has "hardness and uncompromising super performance" that you speak of the 540i/6 has it as well.
I would have to disagree, the 540i/6 is in no way more economical after comparing Nic_s and mine his uses around 4L/100 more than my M5, and the handling is not the same. The M5 for example uses rotary slide bearings in the rear suspension where the 540i/6 uses stock rubber. After driving both one Saturday I have to agree the 540i/6 is awesome but not nearly as tight as the M5
Just my 2 cents, and personally Hand built cars are a lost tradition and although the E34 was not BMW's best effort at quality, the hand built one is by far the best built of all my E34's I have owned
I actually said the handling is almost the same not exactly the same. In the last year I have driven 4 540i's and three M5's and in all cases except one the M5's were less economical.
 
				 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		