Sherwin@Xcede said:
Did you read somebody's mind or how did you come up with that statement? Where did I say that. Read my post again. I emphasised that FROM a stop or standing start it was not benefitting him & might even be hindering him.
Driving the car, & on a roll obviously the difference is huge & it feels like a poor man's charger. That doesn't change.
But when 2 cars stop at the lights, it's a great leveller. You know this. All gearing discrepancies, powerband differences, etc get thrown out the window. The 2 cars get to rev up to wherever they want go from the line. Shorter gearing then doesn't have an advantage when you start from zero.
So to answer you question, No. I am still using my poor man's supercharger theory. Just not for standing starts. Any questions?
No i did not read anyones mind, you told me this many a times. For once in your life please be honest.
Here is some of the proof you post a while back on the M3 FORUMS
http://www.m3forum.net/m3forum/showthread.php?t=119367&page=2
Posted BY M&M aka Sherwin the dishonest farker......
Car is 6MT, launch was 3500rpm on both runs.
I have 25 runs with the stock over many visits there. I have only 2 runs with the 4.1. On only my 2nd launch ever with the 4.1, I bettered my 25 launches with the stock diff. Of course I didn't know that when I was there. It's only when you get home & download the data that can you see the times.(better launch meaning better 60ft meaning better 400m)
Car is 6MT, launch was 3500rpm on both runs.
I have 25 runs with the stock over many visits there. I have only 2 runs with the 4.1. On only my 2nd launch ever with the 4.1, I bettered my 25 launches with the stock diff. Of course I didn't know that when I was there. It's only when you get home & download the data that can you see the times.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last edited by M&M; Thu, Jun-29-2006 at 08:13:02 PM..
M&M
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by M&M
Thu, Jun-29-2006, 09:06:25 PM #13
fourtailpipes
Ch-Check It Out
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 849
iTrader: (3)
Reputation: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i dont want to be a bubble-burster, but this data demonstrates to me that it's definitely not worth it to get a 4.1 diff.
__________________
goodbye e46 m3. it's been fun. everything's for sale. see my posts.
hello 135i.
My Pictures
fourtailpipes
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by fourtailpipes
Thu, Jun-29-2006, 09:25:51 PM #14
M&M
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 241
iTrader: (0)
Reputation: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I disagree with that. I am one that has tried many NA mods. 2 carlengths from a stop (probable more from a roll) is a lot. To get that gain using horsepower will take loads of money, time & tuning headaches. Plus the car just feel so "alive" with the 4.1.
M&M
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by M&M
Thu, Jun-29-2006, 10:03:09 PM #15
fourtailpipes
Ch-Check It Out
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 849
iTrader: (3)
Reputation: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thats why i wont be modifying my M motor at all. there arent any significant gains to be had for less than the cost of a firstborn male. this is the only thing i'll miss about my b5s4... the same day i bought it i spent $700 on a spare ECU with a modest performance chip, and had a 28% gain in horsepower and 33% gain in torque =[m3 power + 1.5(m3 torque)]. it would cost 5 figures to get that percentage gain in the m3. i feel like this motor has already acheived diminishing returns from the factory when it comes to power... thats not necissarily a bad thing.
__________________
goodbye e46 m3. it's been fun. everything's for sale. see my posts.
hello 135i.
My Pictures
fourtailpipes
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by fourtailpipes
Wed, Jul-12-2006, 06:12:04 AM #16
slickrick
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 279
iTrader: (0)
Reputation: 0
Location: Chicago
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Great post!
Now I certainly won't be getting a 4.10 diff. What you gain between 1st and 2nd gear seems minimal. Also, on the track you rarely ever use 1st gear anyways.
slickrick
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by slickrick
Wed, Jul-12-2006, 06:53:54 AM #17
geonet
works for me
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,665
iTrader: (12)
Reputation: 0
Location: Los Angeles
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
awesome thread, thanks. the 4.10 diff is a worthy mod IMO but certainly doesnt provide quite the speed/accel benefits I was hoping for.. particulary off the line/lower gears. however it does seem people really feel the added 'pull' from the 4.10s.. i guess thats part of what you're paying for.
__________________
2003 Porsche Targa Basalt Black
2003 M3 Carbon Black
BMW CCA Los Angeles
geonet
View Public Profile
Visit geonet's homepage!
Find More Posts by geonet
Sun, Jul-16-2006, 03:28:17 AM #18
BAV_M_PWR
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 14,022
iTrader: (24)
Reputation: 0
Location: Greensboro
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I was seriously considering this mod until I saw this post. I
definitely appreciate the information. If only every mod
decision was so cut/dry and could be backed up by no BS
data like this...
__________________
2003 JET BLACK ///M3 SMG
Quote:
Originally Posted by //Ali
What's lesson #2, oh Lord of Ridiculous Posts
BAV_M_PWR
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by BAV_M_PWR
Sun, Jul-16-2006, 07:51:39 PM #19
M&M
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 241
iTrader: (0)
Reputation: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think many people realise how much power is needed to make a dent on a Vbox run. On my '02 M3 I tried many mods. I even had Delage at one stage & it made only around 8-10rwhp. That makes almost no difference on a Vbox run (maybe half to 1 mph higher trap & 0.1 better ET). The only other mod in isolation that might make more than 0.1 & 1mph are the Schricks. I had exhaust with decatt, intake, ECU, racing oils, & Schrick 280/272 in the following dyno comparo to stock:
Base dyno is 299hp & after is 335hp. Here are the Vbox runs for a 30-odd hp gain:
Time to Speed
The modified car is traps 7 km/h higher (4.4mph)
After 14.75 seconds the modified car is 14 metres ahead, which is just about 3 carlengths (M3 is 4.5m in lengh).
So for 35RWHP gain you will gain 0.3-0.5 ET, around 4mph trap & 3 car lengths.
I think the diff is serious bang for buck then & I've tried just about every mod (except supercharger).
M&M
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by M&M
Mon, Jul-24-2006, 10:30:40 AM #20
ShenlongFH
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 5
iTrader: (0)
Reputation: 0
Location: socal
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi~
was these the mods that I saw the video you posted for the M3 you have? definitely great information btw.
__________________
2002 jet blk SMGii M3 coupe.
-gruppeM Ti, kw v2, csl rear diffuser, stock everything else.