To the ahole who cut me off on the n2

R

Rolf

Guest
I said it before and I say it again .... Cape Town drivers :thumbdo:

.... and I live here :cry:
 

yunuso

Member
Dippies said:
:fencelook:

Promotec said:
I said it before and I say it again .... Cape Town drivers :thumbdo:

.... and I live here :cry:

Totally agree


Kish2604 said:
I looked at the title and opened the thread with bated breath...

THank god it was a one series and not a three...:joy:

:nono:



It's a nono waive not the middle finger


My newly acquired gesture
 

Clownshoe

Active member
yunuso said:
Yes I did. Cause he did not want to move over in the first place. Not illegal far as I know. Please correct me if I'm wrong. It's always good to learn

Yes, undertaking (passing on the left) is illegal. I suspect he did not want to move over because there was a car in front of him. And he was leaving a safe distance that you then tried to move into.


:biglol:
I wonder how many similar posts about aholes there are of me!!

You learn something new everyday. So the ahole was in the right.
 

dvst8

///Member
Clownshoe said:
yunuso said:
Yes I did. Cause he did not want to move over in the first place. Not illegal far as I know. Please correct me if I'm wrong. It's always good to learn

Yes, undertaking (passing on the left) is illegal. I suspect he did not want to move over because there was a car in front of him. And he was leaving a safe distance that you then tried to move into.


:biglol:
I wonder how many similar posts about aholes there are of me!!

You learn something new everyday. So the ahole was in the right.



What about Keep Left, Pass Right ?

He should not have been hogging the right lane anyway ?

So he was totally in the right was he ?
 

Photokid

New member
dvst8 said:
Clownshoe said:
yunuso said:
Yes I did. Cause he did not want to move over in the first place. Not illegal far as I know. Please correct me if I'm wrong. It's always good to learn

Yes, undertaking (passing on the left) is illegal. I suspect he did not want to move over because there was a car in front of him. And he was leaving a safe distance that you then tried to move into.


:biglol:
I wonder how many similar posts about aholes there are of me!!

You learn something new everyday. So the ahole was in the right.



What about Keep Left, Pass Right ?

He should not have been hogging the right lane anyway ?

So he was totally in the right was he ?



There must have been slower vehicle/s in the left lane, hence the OP also wanting to use the RHS lane.
 

Baron

Member
Clownshoe said:
Yes, undertaking (passing on the left) is illegal.

And by illegal, he means the same type of illegal as pedestrians walking on a highway, overloading your car, driving your car recklessly because you are the president's body guard. etc.
 

dvst8

///Member
Photokid said:
dvst8 said:
Clownshoe said:
yunuso said:
Yes I did. Cause he did not want to move over in the first place. Not illegal far as I know. Please correct me if I'm wrong. It's always good to learn

Yes, undertaking (passing on the left) is illegal. I suspect he did not want to move over because there was a car in front of him. And he was leaving a safe distance that you then tried to move into.


:biglol:
I wonder how many similar posts about aholes there are of me!!

You learn something new everyday. So the ahole was in the right.



What about Keep Left, Pass Right ?

He should not have been hogging the right lane anyway ?

So he was totally in the right was he ?



There must have been slower vehicle/s in the left lane, hence the OP also wanting to use the RHS lane.



Obviously not if the OP was able to attempt an overtake from the left.
 

Photokid

New member
dvst8 said:
Photokid said:
dvst8 said:
Clownshoe said:
yunuso said:
Yes I did. Cause he did not want to move over in the first place. Not illegal far as I know. Please correct me if I'm wrong. It's always good to learn

Yes, undertaking (passing on the left) is illegal. I suspect he did not want to move over because there was a car in front of him. And he was leaving a safe distance that you then tried to move into.


:biglol:
I wonder how many similar posts about aholes there are of me!!

You learn something new everyday. So the ahole was in the right.



What about Keep Left, Pass Right ?

He should not have been hogging the right lane anyway ?

So he was totally in the right was he ?



There must have been slower vehicle/s in the left lane, hence the OP also wanting to use the RHS lane.



Obviously not if the OP was able to attempt an overtake from the left.



Why did the OP then need to get into the RH lane?

What usually happens is that there is a truck with traffic behind it 50 m ahead in the LH lane travelling at 60km/h.

Entire RH lane travelling at 90km/h overtaking. OP sees a gap ahead of the 1er because he is in an emergency and takes it.

1er driver is not having it with this bimmer driver(OP) who wants to cut through and not follow in line like the rest of the RH lane.

That's just my assumption. OP could clear it up.
 

Kerrits

New member
Two wrongs don't make a right, but:

Regulation 323(5) states: “Where the driver of a motor vehicle which is being driven in the right-hand traffic lane or in the traffic lane furthest to the right on a freeway (hereinafter referred to as the first vehicle) becomes aware that the driver of another motor vehicle (hereinafter referred to as the second vehicle) intends to overtake the first vehicle, the driver of the first vehicle shall steer that vehicle to a lane to the left of the one in which he or she is driving, without endangering himself or herself or other traffic or property on the freeway, and shall not accelerate the speed of his or her vehicle until the second vehicle has passed.”

Regulation 323(6) then goes on to state: “For the purposes of subregulation (5) the driver of the second vehicle may make the driver of the first vehicle aware that he or she intends to overtake the first vehicle by giving the driver thereof a visible signal by means of flashing the headlights of his or her vehicle.”

When on the highway: If you are in the right-most lane, and there is room to move to the left and you don't, you are either a bit distracted, deur die kak (it happens), or you are a c*nt.
Sure, there might be a slow moving car 30m ahead of you that you will want to pass, and it's OK, but the minute that you don't see anything else you want to overtake, just move one lane to the left please.

Edit: it doesn't seem like this applies to what happened to OP, but that was my rant for tonight.
 

yunuso

Member
Photokid said:
dvst8 said:
Photokid said:
dvst8 said:
Clownshoe said:
Yes, undertaking (passing on the left) is illegal. I suspect he did not want to move over because there was a car in front of him. And he was leaving a safe distance that you then tried to move into.


:biglol:
I wonder how many similar posts about aholes there are of me!!

You learn something new everyday. So the ahole was in the right.



What about Keep Left, Pass Right ?

He should not have been hogging the right lane anyway ?

So he was totally in the right was he ?



There must have been slower vehicle/s in the left lane, hence the OP also wanting to use the RHS lane.



Obviously not if the OP was able to attempt an overtake from the left.



Why did the OP then need to get into the RH lane?

What usually happens is that there is a truck with traffic behind it 50 m ahead in the LH lane travelling at 60km/h.

Entire RH lane travelling at 90km/h overtaking. OP sees a gap ahead of the 1er because he is in an emergency and takes it.

1er driver is not having it with this bimmer driver(OP) who wants to cut through and not follow in line like the rest of the RH lane.

That's just my assumption. OP could clear it up.



That's it exactly !
 

Jerez

Well-known member
Have you guys heard that the new EGO BOOSTING LANES now the left lane- whats with trying to be a car length ahead of the next driver, not allowing another driver whose indicating the right if way, tapping off a bit and just chilling, not tail gating, not flashing drivers in front .... Life's too short guys , just CHILL on the roads.

And YUNUSO, im assuming that you were alerted through the armed response, so why were u trying to act line the main actor and racing to your home.
"Home insurance " my friend "home insurance"
 

Clownshoe

Active member
The reason I jumped on this is because it happens a lot and thus yunuso's description was very familiar. Yunuso... lots of people do this and like you are not aware that they are in the wrong.

So putting myself in the shoes of the Bimmer driver (ahole1). I am driving along faster than any other vehicle on the road and there is a slower car in the right lane. I slow down and remain at a distance that insinuates that I want to get by but still a safe distance. Usually in this is due to a slow truck in the left lane and lots of cars passing it in the right lane. So all is good, I am slightly annoyed that several non-BMWs are using the BMW lane but I will tolerate their insolence for a short period.

Then a car undertakes me and tries to get into the safety gap i have left between me and the car in front. So I neatly close the gap. The guy throws his arms up and waggle my finger "Oh, no you don't". "If I have to wait so do you".

Undertaking is illegal/ considered dangerous driving/ frowned upon in most countries. The keep left pass right is a universal rule. The reason is: when undertaking you are passing vehicles on the side with the least visibility. Lets say Ahole1 had decided to move over to the left, you would have been passing him on his blind side and he would have connected you.

A common thing I see is a truck in the middle lane a car passes legally on the outside and moves over after passing the truck. Someone comes illegally up the inside of the truck and moves right. Now you have two cars moving into the same spot.

I might add that it is legal to undertake if there is a solid line between the lanes. Some offramps have this.
 

Twinz

Forum - Support
Staff member
Real life incidences dont play itself off in exactly the manner described by clownshoe. Life on the street is dynamic & changes constantly because vehicles move & change lanes from left to right from right to left. Drivers make decisions as they experience the dynamic flow/movement at the time. The driver who gave yunuso the finger was deliberate & not (considerate) and that is the point of yunuso's story.
 

Clownshoe

Active member
Twinz said:
Real life incidences dont play itself off in exactly the manner described by clownshoe. Life on the street is dynamic & changes constantly because vehicles move & change lanes from left to right from right to left. Drivers make decisions as they experience the dynamic flow/movement at the time. The driver who gave yunuso the finger was deliberate & not (considerate) and that is the point of yunuso's story.

He didn't get the "finger"...
And you waived your finger as if to say "oh know you don't "
. yunuso was in the wrong. Anyway leaving this now.
 
Top