common sense very vague.Karthik said:164kms and you trashing it ? Good luck keeping that engine healthy. Every new car has a run in period. :nonono: Its common sense.
Read some of my previous datalogging threads all that info has been given in the past.Chavoos said:Chavoos said:
Please reply to my question above and what testing equipment did you use?
Do you have results of any other cars tested at the same place ?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Vereeniging. Right next to you.M135i said:Are u from Vanderbijlpark?
Sent from my iPhone
1.4km (1400mts).George Smooth said:Those are nice results.
How long is the test track?
Karthik said:164kms and you trashing it ? Good luck keeping that engine healthy. Every new car has a run in period. :nonono: Its common sense.
Exactly right. First learnt this method when i was building hotrod motors where there was no choice but to do a number of laps on the circuit. 20 laps as you describe and the motors were good to go. Also never had any blowby and this on a motor that is constantly at high revs for ten laps.BillyBob said:Karthik said:164kms and you trashing it ? Good luck keeping that engine healthy. Every new car has a run in period. :nonono: Its common sense.
Depends on how it's broken in...
My old 4.2 S4 had an engine replacement a few years back after a moneyshift.. drove it sedately and kept the revs low for about 100 km, checked the fluids and all the pipes, and then took it on a highway run, where I'd accelerate from low RPM up to high RPM slowly... did this for another 50 km.
Changed the oil, and thereafter, it was balls to the wall - and my S4 with stock cams churned out the same power as one with identical mods and a set of regrind cams, and it never used a drop of oil.
So there's merit to the "running a car in hard" school of thought IMHO - as long as you observe the right warm-up sequence, etc and at least give it a gentle bedding in initially.
UpNcOmiNg! said:Has this been done since the PPK Sir?