R
Rolf
Guest
Any argument on that matter is nil and void as acssa has set his own goal posts by talking racing engines and racing fuel :blab:
end of story....
end of story....
Rommies said:the lower the compression ratio = the more you can boost.
Lets take my car for example:
"The 2JZGE (N/A) is about 9.6:1 as compared to the 2JZGTE (Twin Turbo) at 8.5:1. The 2JZGE can run a turbo, but you won't be able to run as much boost because of the higher CR (compression ratio) pistons. Your effictive CR will climb faster. With about 9psi boost an 8.5:1 engine will have an effective CR of about 13.7:1 and a 9.6:1 motor will have an effective CR of about 15.5:1. In terms of how the engine will respond the higher compression NA motor will not like more boost. The NA motor will however make better low end TQ. Which in the real world of daily drivers is preferable to a laggy boosted to hell dyno queen"
So lets say for arguments sake:
F30 320i (11:1 CR) internals can handle 1 BAR of boost will make more power than a F30 328i (10:1 CR) boosted at one 1 BAR, BUT the 328i (10:1 CR) would be able to be boost 1.2 BAR where the 320i (11:1 CR) would not be able too. Because the compression ratio of the 320i is already too high and cannot handle anymore boost.
So in the end the F30 328i has more potential tuning than the F30 320i
Am I correct or am I talking shit?
Rolf@PromotecAuto said:Any argument on that matter is nil and void as acssa has set his own goal posts by talking racing engines and racing fuel :blab:
end of story....
Julz said:To run boost on a high compression engine is highly impractical.First of all you run the risk of some serious detonation and secondly you are doomed to always running Methanol or high Octane fuel which doesn't make it a Street friendly setup.I agree that high compression will spool up the turbo quicker but it still makes more sense to match the right Turbo to a low compression setup for maximum boost.
The only reason they would run higher compression on the 320 is to limit its tuning potential.Not everybody is happy running high Octane fuel or Methanol on their daily drive.
Rolf@PromotecAuto said:We are still not discussing things on the original subject.
Standard production vehicles do not have water / meth injections and playing with piggyback system on fuel on the F30 320i might give you some gains but I can promise you that your economy will go down the drain :thumbdo:
Promotec said:We are still not discussing things on the original subject.
Standard production vehicles do not have water / meth injections and playing with piggyback system on fuel on the F30 320i might give you some gains but I can promise you that your economy will go down the drain :thumbdo:
bilal04 said:What would be a better buy? Does the 320i and 328i have the same motor?
If one does software on the f30 320i would it be performing same as a 328i?
Naruto said:"bilal04 Wrote: What would be a better buy? Does the 320i and 328i have the same motor?
If one does software on the f30 320i would it be performing same as a 328i?"
If you want more power then go for the 328i and keep your MP
If you want better consumption buy a 320i
Naruto said:"bilal04 Wrote: What would be a better buy? Does the 320i and 328i have the same motor?
If one does software on the f30 320i would it be performing same as a 328i?"
If you want more power then go for the 328i and keep your MP
If you want better consumption buy a 320i
acssa said:11:1 compression engine with a turbo has more potential than a 10:1 compression engine with turbo.
S1NGH 001 said:Chip logic is claiming to achieve 210kw from the 320i :thumbs:
Gbmw said:S1NGH 001 said:Chip logic is claiming to achieve 210kw from the 320i :thumbs:
whoa....that's tempting to investigate :=): Would love those figures !!
Sirhan said:buy a 320i and change the badge to a 328i :flyfun: