BMW 650i Yes or No? Pros and Cons?

ShaunAshley

Active member
Hi Guys, 

My brother really wants a 6 series, he found a clean 650i, it has 47 000kms and is a 2014.
Has great specs.

He is coming from a X4 35i.

Anything to look out for, worry about?

Price is R460k.

Really appreciate the advice.
Regards
 

Attachments

  • 0999.jpg
    0999.jpg
    239 KB · Views: 504
  • 099.jpg
    099.jpg
    284.8 KB · Views: 501
  • 09.jpg
    09.jpg
    188.9 KB · Views: 504

TurboLlew

Honorary ///Member
N63 has many issues unfortunately, though the mileage is low on this one so you could probably do preventative work. Does he not want to just get an M6 or a 40d?
 

Rotinaj

Active member
No just no. It's a complete pile of junk. If a 6 series he wants 640i/d is what you get. The N63 is the proverbial cherry on top of the BMW pile of unreliable engines.
 

ShaunAshley

Active member
Thanks guys, with your help he cancelled the test drive haha :):)

Im trying to get him to stick to n55 or b58. But he needs 4 doors.

Regards
 

zaleonardz

Well-known member
The N63 is a magnificent machine when it runs well, and the pre-face was fret with issues. The face lift solved most of this issues.

But when it runs, OMFG what a nice place to be.

My concern, with it being out of plan (2014 model) that 450k or half a bar is excessive, as that thing will depreciate like a lead baloon. He can expect to loose 200k over the next 2 years at least.. Had he of gotten it for 250 or even 300, bargain...

But half bar, for something potentially dodgy, is iffy


Oh and 640d FTMFW !!!!
 

GravityLee

Well-known member
N63 , even the TU, is the engine to consider when you’re buying the car with lots of plan, and your biggest worry is what loaner you’ll get when your car is in the shop. They make early N54s look good in terms of reliability.

Out of warranty you have to be a serious masochist to do this to yourself.
 

Nikhil

Honorary ///Member
Please stay away from the 50i, everyone I know with the original and TU engines ended up selling because of endless issues
 

TurboLlew

Honorary ///Member
Any redeeming qualities the N63 might have in the 20% of the time it is properly working is negated by the fact that you can buy an S63Tu based car for the same amount of money you would pay for an N63 car and doing the preventative work on it (which will not stop the inevitable anyway). The only people who will tell you the N63 is not garbage are those that own them and are suffering from Stockholm syndrome. It is not any more expensive (it is probably cheaper in fact) to own an M5 or M6 vs. an x50.

This forum is full of people who have bought either junk OR a sub-M model OR a car that was quickly surpassed by a revision but will tell you things like 'oh but it sounds better' (this is the N63 owner's go-to) or that it 'drives better' or or for other cars 'it is a baby M2/M3/M5/M6' GTFO.

There is an N63 for sale which some tuner managed to convince a guy to invest in heavily: Forged motor, upgraded intercooler, turbos, suspension etc etc. Apparently this car makes 400 wheel (so maybe 10kw more than a bone stock first run M5) and it apparently had to be detuned to 340kw (no doubt because this 'freshly built' car was still full of issues).

We must stop being polite about how bad some of these cars are I think and even where cars are fine (eg: if you have one, it is not worth upgrading yet) telling potential new owners that 'the old one was better'. I am very aware that there are cars this does apply to... but N63 based cars are not among them.
 

RAArmstrong

///Member
JN plate on a 2014 combined with a skew bonnet badge. This is accident damaged and repaired.

The 50i issues have been well covered above.

Stay the F away. Get a 640d.
 

Rotinaj

Active member
TurboLlew said:
Any redeeming qualities the N63 might have in the 20% of the time it is properly working is negated by the fact that you can buy an S63Tu based car for the same amount of money you would pay for an N63 car and doing the preventative work on it (which will not stop the inevitable anyway). The only people who will tell you the N63 is not garbage are those that own them and are suffering from Stockholm syndrome. It is not any more expensive (it is probably cheaper in fact) to own an M5 or M6 vs. an x50.

This forum is full of people who have bought either junk OR a sub-M model OR a car that was quickly surpassed by a revision but will tell you things like 'oh but it sounds better' (this is the N63 owner's go-to) or that it 'drives better' or or for other cars 'it is a baby M2/M3/M5/M6' GTFO.

There is an N63 for sale which some tuner managed to convince a guy to invest in heavily: Forged motor, upgraded intercooler, turbos, suspension etc etc. Apparently this car makes 400 wheel (so maybe 10kw more than a bone stock first run M5) and it apparently had to be detuned to 340kw (no doubt because this 'freshly built' car was still full of issues).

We must stop being polite about how bad some of these cars are I think and even where cars are fine (eg: if you have one, it is not worth upgrading yet) telling potential new owners that 'the old one was better'. I am very aware that there are cars this does apply to... but N63 based cars are not among them.

Amen brother Amen.

It's a complete piece of shit and i wish people would stop talking so much kak. the TU version of this engine still had so many US mandated recalls and revisions you would think they did nothing on it.
 

TBP88

Well-known member
I think in general this forum is pretty reasonable on the cars. But yeah, we do get a bit caught up in "BMW"ness... The truth is a lot of the higher performance engines from BMW of the last 20yrs have had a variety of issues (6cyl, v8 and v10 bearings, vanos, solenoids), N54 wastegate issues and cooling issues, and on and on and on.

The reality is that we are to some extent blinded, so we need to keep that in mind. I don't feel like I got an S54 car and was duped by the BMW forum, the opposite really, there was a lot of openness and relative clarity about the costs of ownership. Thankfully!
 
Top