ChefDJ
///Member
Maverick550 said:So from what I have gathered from reading up here and elsewhere, after removing swirl-flaps you would lose a bit of power.
No...
Maverick550 said:So from what I have gathered from reading up here and elsewhere, after removing swirl-flaps you would lose a bit of power.
Stompie said:ChefDJ said:Just get the aluminium plates and have peace of mind that they will last forever.
Order both sizes and sell the one you don't need afterwards.
A family member owns his own CNC workshop. Busy chatting to him to see if we can start manufacturing for the local market in aluminum then we dont have to import anymore. :smilebounce:
So i have sent him drawings i created so waiting to hear what he says after he looks at the files.
Hopefully we can get it done cheaply...lets see.
ChefDJ said:Maverick550 said:So from what I have gathered from reading up here and elsewhere, after removing swirl-flaps you would lose a bit of power.
No...
Maverick550 said:ChefDJ said:Maverick550 said:So from what I have gathered from reading up here and elsewhere, after removing swirl-flaps you would lose a bit of power.
No...
One would think that seeing you’re administrator in chief and honorary member you’d have more to contribute to a thread than your monosymbolic excuse for a refutal.
While you over inflated ego may misinform you to think that your No, without any further explanation is adequate, unfortunately in the real world and assuming you actually have a contribution to make to the thread specifically, you would then inform us lesser mortals as to why this is not the case, so that we may all become better informed.
So, as initially stated, there is a wide experience beyond yours, and which and documented that this is indeed the experience of many who have removed swirl flaps, and again was what I was expecting.
Which is why I posted that I was pleasantly surprised to see a gain on the Dyno.
However this was more a consequence of careful mapping to compensate for the removal of said flaps.
I have not found a thread where its been claimed that there is an automatic improvement in performance through the removal of swirl-flaps.
It has either been neutral or negative effect on performance.
There are countless threads in this regard.
So my response to your no is that remove the n from your response.
You’re left with O.
Your actual contribution in this post.
http://www.bimmerforums.co.uk/forum/f18/2003-e46-320d-swirl-flap-removal-down-power-t277425/
http://www.bimmerforums.co.uk/forum/f15/blanked-swirl-flaps-less-power-t216529/
http://www.bimmerforums.co.uk/forum/f15/2006-e60-530d-swirl-flaps-removed-but-problem-help-t47120/
http://www.e46zone.com/forum/topic/56569-320d-swirl-flaps-removal-down-on-power/
http://www.alfaowner.com/Forum/alfa...618-observations-after-swirl-flap-delete.html
Solo Man said:I have done maybe eight or so cars (could be more) with the method of removing the shaft and using brass taper head screws with nuts which i then bond with pratley. Works for me. Just saying!
Maverick550 said:While you over inflated ego
Maverick550 said:I say things how I see them and how I receive them.
I don’t consider that I insulted anyone but responded within the context of the value of a reply directed at me.
I would consider No to be a negative response.
What is a thread but merely an online conversation.
Could anyone in clear conscience face to face refute a point without backing it up?
Doing it in public place you would raise temperature, same on a Forum.
If I am skating on thin Ice so be it.
I don’t see why I should tolerate a meaningless response directed at me personally.
The Poster has gone on to say that it is the result of a Forum Glitch but has made no further attempt to substantiate his negative.
In my opinion this is a public space where we can learn and share from each other, through a mutual love of cars, generally.
And hopefully this leads to networking on other levels even if just buying and selling each others cars, knowing (hopefully) you are acquiring a much loved example.
My technical knowledge is limited and most of my cars are old, albeit in perfect shape.
But nothing beats experiencing all the engineering that has gone in to your car knowing its in perfect working order.
Intelligent, meaningful contribution assists within that aim and while I could probably buy any car on the market I couldn’t bear the thought of being constrained to servicing at any dealer.
The point being, Forums such as this and others provide a knowledge base for those of us who maintain our vehicles on our own dime.
In the absence of said Forums I would have remained ignorant on unique issues specific to the 11 odd vehicles I own and maintain.
For those of us who have acquired previously owned sometimes we pay the purchase price three times over, to get the car to where it is ‘new’ again.
And real information is valuable rather than a ton of emoji’s that litter most threads, or at least a well written response adds interest to the thread, rather than dumbing down of a thread with countless emoji’s.
Which I assume count as a post and then enables you to enter various areas restricted to me because I don’t have the correct post count.
Perhaps it’s a generational thing?
If I must be banned for calling someone out in my attempt to raise the bar, no problem.
I give respect automatically but I receive it as a disrespect to tell me no.
No what?
There was nothing to prevent the poster following up with a subsequent post in order to clarify his point of view.
I have no problem with the No, I have a problem with that was the beginning and the end, Its an insult to my intelligence actually and I responded accordingly.
Maverick550 said:Do is that glitch still preventing your informative reply being posted?
If so I apologise.
If not, my response stands.
ChefDJ said:
Maverick550 said:You do not deprive me personally of anything by withholding your information.
My swirl-flaps are done.
There are others though who seek said information on this very thread.
I didn’t DIY so am not able to speak authortively and guide them through the process.
But you can, apparently, but you wont.
Lets deal with more facts.
We have your post YESTERDAY at around 5 saying nothing.
I waited 24 hours for you to substantiate your response.
This was not forthcoming. Not 5 minutes, 24 hours later.
In the interim you have participated on numerous other threads, Glitch, notwithstanding.
But have made no attempt to rectify what you put out there.
In 24 hours you must have surely become aware as to how your post stands but you felt no need to explain further, that the info got lost or a commitment to elaborate / update later.
All considering you were attempting to contribute valuable information.
Yet, you have displayed no visible handicap with timely response subsequently, you also have refused to be the better man and say here is my post and the information that was missing from the original.
As it stands I call you out by all available evidence and reiterate that your contribution was zero.
You however claim that you have this so called info and in fact are now withholding it because of my response 24 hours later.
I understand. Perfectly. :thumbs: