CocoPops
Honorary ///Member
Dusty said:ASH said:Hold on a second, the pricing in the article is completely wrong, as the BMW should be priced at +- R400K, if it is an auto with sport line. Someone at IOL motoring is smoking some good stuff.
THe article does mention that the A4 is still comparable. It is however the BMW that is a completely new model line and the A4 which is a just a facelift.
I think a more favourable comparison is the E90 Facelift 320i vs the facelifted A4.
The BMW does win because it is the newer technology model, and the A4 is not outclassed even though it is an older generation car.
I'm happy when a BMW wins a test, but sometimes I dont like to have this feeling :rofl: around when I know they comparing two different generation models.
Have to agree with Ash here:fencelook:. Why compare the 320i with the A4 1.8T, it should be compared to the 2.0T and here the Audi will take the win (155kw) and yes pricing is totally incorrect the 1.8T goes for R350 000 while the 155kw 2.0T goes for R390 000. Sorry guys but if I had to choose between 320i and A4 2.0T it will be the Audi hands down!
I dont agree with this in anyway. they are basically comparing the bottom of the range BMW, with a comparable audi in terms of pricing, the 1.8t SE is the one to compare. BMW probably supplied them with the 320i Auto instead of manual, so they compared essentially. also it seems that South Africa is on a mission to level the playing fields from the german giants, whereas the int. players say it as it is. 3 series massacres the competition.
Also, IOL is not the most reverred motoring enthusiasts to give the best reviews, so I read most articles in this light.