VictorMike
///Member
Fordkoppie said:* The corvette specifically is cramped more than an Escort could ever imagine
Sure, but at least in the Vette the roof can come off to negate this.
Fordkoppie said:* Pretty and ugly is subjective
Fair enough. I will admit, OP's silver escort looks much nicer than what I usually see them as. Body panels are straight and everything. I bet its better than when it came off the factory floor! In general cars from the 70's don't do it for me in the design department. There are exceptions of course, but they are few and far between.
Fordkoppie said:* You have no idea how bad the build quality is on a vette. European fords are like Rolls Royce's compared to a Corvette ito build quality. I mean you are sitting inside recycled canoes for crying out loud
I concede this one. I know how bad the build quality on American cars can be.
Fordkoppie said:* Nevermind leaf springs..... On a vette, you only get 1 leaf spring per axle (Note "spring" as in singular noun)
Yeah, nie. You talking shit here. The '60 'Vette had 2 leaf springs in the back. Also the car is almost 8 years older then the Escort, so I think I can give it a pass.
Fordkoppie said:And all these cars : ('59 SL, '59 Cadillac convertible, '64 Mustang, '60 Corvette) are like trying to maneuver the USS Enterprise inside a china shop when you took them to the race track where the Escorts shined
Like I said, before, I do not doubt the racing heritage of the Escorts, and I doubt OP is doing any serious racing in his. Furthermore, I would never take any classic car on track, so this point is quite moot.
So in conclusion: it seems the Escorts are popular because they were amazing little racers that were affordable to the every man. Coolio.
OP, your examples look amazing, especially the Mk.I. I agree with Fordkoppie on one thing, the period correctness (eg wheel size).