Josh-ZN said:
ASH M said:
A driver of a 135 almost put his car into the bushes, trying to chase me up Peacevale.
I'm sure everyone whom has travelled up there on the N3, will know what i'm talking about.
i dont think that has anything to do with the car but a lot to do with the driver.
Very true, but equal drivers will see the 135 a long, long, lonnnnnggggg way back.
Dmonic1 said:
ASH M said:
Well I only drive my M3 on weekends, sometimes only twice a month. But i tell you it gets driven like how a M3 was built to be driven.
Straight line is fun, but you get bored very quickly.
How often do you visit a race track? MSports pack is also fun on public roads....:thumbs:
ASH M said:
Here's a quick one:
Merc's most powerful N/A is the SLS with 67.7 kw/litre
BMW e46 M3 - 78.75 kw/litre
BMW e9x M3 - 77.25 kw/litre
BMW e60 M5 - 74.6 kw/litre
Let the figures do the talking :rollsmile:
Add Honda Figures there and the M doesnt seem impressive then...:thumbs:
This is the beauty about the M3, it doesn't have to be driven on a track to be enjoyed. Sure not many drivers will be able be able to extract the full potential of a M3 on the road, let alone a race track but still enjoy it. I've taken mine to the limit and a little beyond on and off the track.
My 330i has the M-Sport suspension, and yes its excellent on the road but doesn't hold a candle to the M3. They are simply on different planets. Its that much of a difference.
The rear gets unsettled rather quickly in comparison and body roll is very noticeable.
BTW making decent power from a small engine isn't as difficult as extracting it from a large capacity engine. What great large capacity high revving motor has Honda ever produced? Revving a V8 to 8600rpm is something, in a four cylinder its easy, plain and simple.
Their great NSX out put out 201kw from a 3.0l, and 216kw from a 3.2l . If the Japs are that how do their 1000cc superbikes compare to the BMW S1000RR?