Let us be fair

Vicus

New member
I almost responded to this thread:

http://www.bmwfanatics.co.za/showthread.php?tid=49098

But, decided that rather than derail it further, I would rather just post a new thread.

I have noticed that lots of people are great fans of the slightly older BMW’s, especially those with more than 4 cylinders, and find the newer deigns somehow inferior. I suppose from their frame of reference, they are entirely correct. These members lament the fact that BMW no longer build cars this way. I understand. Truly, I do. Their arguments certainly have merit. What most of them say, is certainly true.

But......

Before one starts insulting the brand of car you used to love, let us take a step back, see the whole picture, and be fair:

Cars are consumables, always have been always will be. I sort of agree with Gizmo that there is a trend to design cars to last 5-10 years these days, and less regard for the fate of the owner thereafter. But it is not universally true in all things. It is well known that the quality of turbos in diesels, for instance have actually improved. The E90 & F30 turbo being more reliable than earlier versions. This actually improves the out of motor plan situation.

That said, there are definite trends in car design over the last decade that cannot be disputed:

1. Cars are designed in such a way as to be increasingly difficult for a layman to maintain with his own technical skill. As a 20 year old I had no difficulty changing the clutch on my Ford Cortina 30S. It would take a very knowledgeable 20 year old to do the same to a modern 3 litre sedan today.

2. Cars are increasingly designed to not be undergoing major repairs. The exact conditions en specifications of the factory assembled machines are getting harder and harder to duplicate. Of course it can still be done (has to), but it is getting harder and harder....

3. Downsizing. Engines are becoming smaller, lighter and en more efficient. Small turbo petrol engines have arrived, and I believe they are here to stay. They will be hard to beat for efficiency. Diesels are also just getting better and better.

4. Electronics are becoming more sophisticated, but also cheaper. Some small cars now has SATNAV as standard, with no significant increase in price.

So, in general cars are becoming even more of a ”consumable” than ever before. But also, they are getting more efficient. On the other hand, build quality seems to have suffered. Cars feel less solid, tinny almost.

Before we rant and rave though. We should try to understand what drives these trends. Mainly two things. They go hand-in-hand:

1. Competition. There are more motor manufacturers out there than ever before. Profit margins are just getting smaller and smaller. Very few manufacturers actually make really bad cars anymore. If they do, they will simply just not survive. And the drive for some kind of competitive edge has become insane. And before you say that a car designed to last less than 10 years is a bad car. Just hold up, think again. The world has changed. People have changed. As mad as it may seem to some of us, the modern trend is for people to replace rather than repair. They would rather buy a new car with all the latest gadgets and innovations. The manufacturers don’t really have a choice here. They have to follow this trend. They have to ensure they compete in efficiency and technology. And they are getting rewarded less and less for cars lasting longer than 10 years.

2. Technology. And this does not necessarily mean electronics. Mechanical technology advancement has been huge. But to get the advantage of these developments, more and more exacting build requirements have to be met. Requirements that are getting harder and harder to duplicate. More parts, more complexity. Certain parts are becoming more expensive to replace.

Understand this: We, the consumers, are the drivers of market trends. We, the consumers either reward or punish what the producer makes available. It can never be any other way in a market that is so hugely competitive. 30 years ago, a good car was a car than will last a 100 years. Now, a good car, is one that will last 5-10 years, is super efficient, and has all the latest electronic gadgets. This is not what manufacturers say. This is what we, the consumers are dictating to them. Manufacturers either conform to this, or they die.

To sum up:

- Cars are increasingly designed to be a consumable. To last for 5-10 years, and then be discarded. Sad, but true.

- Cars are becoming more efficient, and technologically advanced.

- Cars are becoming harder to maintain by the “home” mechanic.

Is it the end of an era? – yes.

Is it avoidable? – no.

Is this phenomenon limited to BMW? – no.

Is it sad? – yes. ( As is the loss of all things we have come to value)

Do we need to adapt? – yes.

Should we embrace it? – yes......we need to, we have little choice. Look, I am 46 years old. I understand why many of us are sad....I really do. But it is not going help us. The world is changing, and we will need to change along with it.

My advice: Those of you with 6 or 8 cylinder cars that you love, and lovingly maintain. Keep them and love and appreciate them for as longs as they may last. But understand that eventually you will need to adapt to the new way of things. Adapt your financial planning to the fact that you will most likely not drive a 15 year old luxury sedan ever again.

In the future you will be driving newer cars. You don’t have much choice. They will be very reliable (there will be the odd exception) and efficient in the first 5-8 years. They will be full of bells and whistles. And after that time you will replace them. And if you can’t afford a new-ish BMW, you will have to buy a cheaper brand. Learn to like it. Otherwise you are going to be unhappy every time you think of cars.

Me, I love my E90 320d. It is a truly great car. I will drive it to about 150 000 km. Then it has to go. What will I buy then ? I will have to wait and see if I can afford a BMW younger than 2 years old by then. If I can’t, it will have to be something else. I hope I can though.....
 

haXor

Member
I agree. Its the reason why I'm hanging onto my 2005 E46 330D and never letting it go. I love being able to work on it myself and have that satisfaction feeling when a DIY job goes right.

I will buy other newer beema's but this one STAYS!!
 

Dewald Basson

///Member
In 10 -15 years time this whole argument will be shifted to small turbo engines vs. even smaller hybrid turbo engines. It happens every time there is "big" shift in the motoring world. And then there will be even more tech for cheaper.
 

bex-ed

New member
True. I'm in agreement with you and all who share the sentiment.

But I shudder to imagine what a drive would be like without my N/A V8. The parts are kak expensive to replace, but the experience of the drive more than compensates.

Yes, modded stage 2, 2-litre turbos klaap me these days. But the sensation of the drive is still priceless.

I guess I will eventually have to "adapt" to a synthesized, turbocharged V8 - or something sound.
HMMM! Suddenly a V12 Aston Martin just became appealing... :inlove:
 

DieselFan

Honorary ///Member
I personally think it's to early to tell. There are e90s with well over 200 000kms. There's a e90 320d on the forum with over 250 000 kms with the original turbo.

The e90s hit 10 years next year. And they are not just breaking. The f30s are far too young to tell.

And while the interior as some say may he cheapish etc etc. I'm sure bmw are using high quality components for the engine and vitality of the car.

Sent from Samsung S5
 

moranor@axis

///Member
Official Advertiser
I believer the aftermarket will always provide solutions regardless of what manufactures do for the right cars...

personally I see little reason to 'upgrade' from the e46 and will probably keep rebuilding it forever :rollsmile:
 

anton-sa

Active member
I think the topic of cars has another angle aswell, for me, a car can be 50yrs old, if it checks some boxes for me (technical stuff), then i see no reason to change, alot of people attach their cars to their status and or place in the food chain...

i was really happy with my e39 525i manual i had for almost 5yrs. why did i change it? it was going to need some big money for suspension bits, so i decided on changing, so i got a 530d e39 also in manual and rather spent the suspension money on that...

to satisft my oldskool needs, i have a e28 5 series.. although the e39 is also by todays standards oldskool...

still a consumable though, but a consumable can be "consumed" for a long time, just you start having to spend some money...

like a full suspension overhaul... its a big chunk of money that a great percentage wont want to spend they will just rather buy another...and another...

there are also people trapped in the mindset of staying away from a older car because although it might fit the bill technically, interms of image it wont always. keeping up with the jones's etc...
 

Vicus

New member
Thanks for all the replies guys. Valid observations all. I guess what prompted me to post this is the couple of posts that I read that attacks the build quality of the newer BMW's.

I just really wanted to show that BMW is not the villain. BMW is simply trying to satisfy public demand. Also that for advancing technology/efficiency there is a price to pay (change). And that it is not really all bad.

For the aspects we are losing, we are gaining others. All in all, I don't think the quality of our BMW's are deteriorating. The emphasis is just changing.

Our cars can still last a long time if we care for them properly. E90's and F30's too.

One thing one must keep in mind too, is that there are exceptions to all rules. Example:

Someone posted bad fuel consumption on a BMW 320d with fairly low km's. Now, we all know this is not the rule? One bad experience does not a bad summer make.

I am basically saying two things:

1. Before ranting, just take a breather, step back, look at the complete picture, and be fair (to BMW).

2. Yes the newer models are very different. Appreciate the old for what made them special. But at the same time realize that the new are just as special in their own way.

Attitude is everything!
 

Philip Foglar

///Member
Very relevant points! Cars have most certainly become disposable items, just a pity they are still so expensive considering this little fact. But that's the way it goes, also car prices locally are insane compared to most countries.

The complexity of modern cars where just about every possible electrical device or sensor is used means that at some stage it becomes either near impossible to fix or continue operating reliably, and cost effectively to fix for that matter. And I most certainly believe that many manufacturers are "designing" limited lifespan into their cars, if that makes sense.

The sad reality is that as time goes on, most of our more modern cars will rely on youtube vids to show "what they were like" instead of having actual and proper function examples, and I am not talking about manufacturer stored examples, I am talking about the average Joe that has just held onto and looked after his "pride and joy" over the years.

I do have some faith that aftermarket companies will be able to help these people (including many of us) keep our cars alive longer than designed to.

As much as I am also someone that tends to prefer the older BMW's, one has to accept and "admit" that the newer technology offers better performance, better economy, and better safety, and all of these criteria are of huge importance these days. It would just be nice if cars were still made to last though...
 

OppositeLockMT

Active member
Couldn't agree more.

But, as market drivers we have to take into consideration the fact that those who primarily value said attributes (easy maintenance, efficiency etc) are predominantly those who care less about the treasured "analogue" and "involving" experience we would get from the cars of yesteryear. There is no denying that what we have available to us today exceeds expectations in terms of offering a well balanced package, but I feel like that somewhat takes away from the overall experience.

There is a certain inexplicable sensation that I get from driving an E36/E46 with enthusiasm and verve that I feel is lacking in the newer models.

There is no doubt that the likes of the E90 and F30 still remain true to the "ultimate driving machine" moniker , but I feel that what we got from BMWs of the 80s and 90s catered more to the enthusiast and those who looked for a true driving experience.

That being said, manufacturers are bridging the gap and offering cars that are versatile to appeal to a wider market. The C class, A4 and 3 series are closer in terms of offering something worthy and enjoyable than ever before. As BMW wants to continue to be successful in the the automotive industry, they have been forced to target consumers who value different things. Which is why today we see the likes of the 2 series active tourer that are a step away from the reputation BMW built from offering RWD and RWD only.

My only hope is that BMW continues to offer cars that are raw and full of emotion; the ///M brand and ///M performance range are the flag bearers in this regard.

What we are seeing now is an inevitable evolution.
 

Vicus

New member
OppositeLockMT said:
Couldn't agree more.

But, as market drivers we have to take into consideration those who primarily value said attributes (easy maintenance, efficiency etc) are predominantly those who care less about the treasured "analogue" and "involving" experience we would get from the cars for yesteryear. There is no denying that what we have available to us today exceeds expectations in term of offering a balanced package, but I feel like that somewhat takes away from the overall experience.

There is a certain inexplicable sensation that I get from driving an E36/E46 with enthusiasm and verve that I feel is lacking in the newer models.

There is no doubt that the likes of the E90 and F30 still remain true to the "ultimate driving machine" moniker , but I feel that what we got from BMWs of the 80s and 90s catered more to the enthusiast and those who looked for a true driving experience.

That being said, manufacturers are bridging the gap and offering cars that are versatile to appeal to a wider market. The C class, A4 and 3 series are closer in terms of offering something worthy and enjoyable than ever before. As BMW wants to continue to be successful in the the automotive industry, they have been forced to target consumers who value different things. Which is why today we see the likes of the 2 series active tourer that are a step away from the reputation BMW built from offering RWD and RWD only.

My only hope is that BMW continues to offer cars that are raw and full of emotion; the ///M brand and ///M performance range are the flag bearers in this regard.

What we are seeing now is an inevitable evolution.

Nice post :)
 
I have heard lots of ignorant comments from people who never owned or do not work on E90's that quality is poor. On my second one, and I am yet to find fault.

To compare say, a 15 year old car with a 6 year old one, says what exactly? that the one is older and thus there is more evidence of how well they last.

In the same breath it would be silly of me to complain about the F30, I have never owned one, worked on one, or could afford one, to say my e90 is better. Same it would be arrogant of me to say my e90 is better than that of my swaer's e46, as he just spend R6k on a service and pumps, mine has not nearly done the amount of work his car has.
 

Prev

Administrator
Staff member
Nice interesting points of views and good clean thread. Well done OP :thumbs:

I have owned an E30, 2 x E46s and I still own an E36 and E92. These various generations have different characteristics that give them their own unique personalities. The E46 to me was a very well balanced car for what it offered and I am a huge admirer of that generation of 3 series. All of these cars still look great despite their age if well maintained. The E90 pushed the development further but for my personal tastes got it wrong in some aspects - but that's just my personal preference that disagrees with BMW. Nevertheless the E90 is in my opinion a great car. I have also driven the F30 and I enjoyed the experience.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

anton-sa

Active member
theres one point which i think has not been touched on, its that
of USER FRIENDLYNESS.... the sort of power "standard" cars are coming out with now is crazy... this power has to be accessible and safe, even for a more challenged driver... gosh i think many drivers dont even know what it feels like to slam on brakes at high speed, let alone losing traction etc..

as a manufacturer you have no idea of the skill of your target audience...
yet "excitement,thrill,speed" sells... what do you do? you make it accessible for the masses...

different strokes different folks... some people like a super comfortable ride where they dont feel any road bumps etc etc..

me, personally, i'd call that drive, VAGUE and UNINSPIRING, i like to feel and sense whats going on underneath me...
 

Iceman007

Active member
DieselFan said:
I personally think it's to early to tell. There are e90s with well over 200 000kms. There's a e90 320d on the forum with over 250 000 kms with the original turbo.

The e90s hit 10 years next year. And they are not just breaking. The f30s are far too young to tell.

And while the interior as some say may he cheapish etc etc. I'm sure bmw are using high quality components for the engine and vitality of the car.

Sent from Samsung S5

I agree with DieselFan. Lets wait and see how the F30's hold up. I can tell you the the new 320d range is way better and more reliable than the early e46 models
 

dingeth

New member
Nice post!

I'm a first-time bmw owner, but have a ton of "bee-em koppe" buds that have always been crazy about the brand, way back when i was still driving another german sedan from ingolsadt. One of my buds in particular has had more e30's than i can remember and also has an e46 diesel in the garage. Another has a pristine 325is.

Anyway, my point is that because of them (and others) I've driven in e30's, e36's, e46's, e90's and f30's. The funny thing is that even though they love their "old school, proper bmw's", before taking the plunge they all advised me to go for my current ride, which happens to be an e90 320d. The reason? believe it or not: reliability.

It's true what the OP says as well, different strokes for different fokes. I, for one, didn't need much encouragement to ditch the 6 cyclinders for a newer 4 cyclinder. My experience (and this is just me) is that while I still love the look of an e46, i'd get frustrated driving one as a daily. No matter how well a car is cared for and maintained, you'll always get the usual squeaks and rattles based purely on the fact that the car is 10 years old. Secondly, even if build quality has gone down (I really can't comment here as i've never actually owned and lived with any of the models mentioned above on a daily basis for a prolonged period of time), you cannot deny that the ride in a newer car (same series obviously) is alot better than those of yesteryear. Finally, and this really is personal preference, i just find that while looks may be subjective, its hard to argue that the interiors of subsequent models are not a consistent improvement. I'm one of those guys that just love the new tech on display inside as much as the performance of the car.

In terms of reliability, I havent had a single issue as yet with the e90, drives like a dream and the mix of great economy and nice power is awesome. that said, it's gonna take a lot from this tractor to match my previous hyundai getz in terms of reliability lol (owned it for 9 years and 185,000 km's - not a single mechanical issue, only normal servicing and usual wear and tear items)!!

P.S my pet hate: Runflat tyres and no space for a proper spare in the boot. WHY BMW??????
 
Top