E46 330i 3.38 Diff Swap - An Objective Review

AdiS

Well-known member
Introduction

One of the most commonly suggested OEM+ modifications for the E46 330i manual is to swap the standard 2.93 rear differential with the 3.38 ratio rear differential that is fitted as standard to the E46 330i Automatic. Known as the ‘poor man’s supercharger’, the purported benefits are improved acceleration, and a more ‘lively’ character to the car. 

Here is a video by Engineering Explained which analyses the impact of installing a shorter ratio rear diff:

[video=youtube]

Why change the Diff?

The demeanor of the E46 330i with the standard 2.93 ratio diff could be described as lethargic. This should not be interpreted as slow, the M54B30 is a lovely, torquey motor and the car is certainly brisk by anyones standards. But the M54B30 is not a very "free-revving" engine, so it’s character does feel somewhat lazy with its torquey power delivery. 

I have always been curious about this mod, and was reluctant to to do it on my first E46 330i for fear of compromising the fuel efficiency of the car. With the 6 speed gearbox, highway cruising at 120km/h is at a relaxed 2600rpm, and the car can achieve roughly 6L/100km in ideal conditions. Recently my curiosity got the better of me and I sought to fit a 3.38 diff to my 330i. 

How did it change the car?

The outcome was interesting. The first thing I noticed when pulling off in first gear, was that the gearing was noticeable shorter than before. The consequence of this that no one ever discusses is that in traffic situations, you find yourself changing through first, second and third gear a lot more quickly and a lot more often. This in itself, is a little more tiresome in daily driving situations. My normal driving style in daily commutes is relaxed, with no excessive revving through the gears. I usually change early and keep the revs relatively low. I actually had to change my driving style a little in order to achieve a smooth drive when changing from first to second. There’s always a subtle art to driving manual BMWs of this generation smoothly, and I found that the best way was to change out of first at around 3000rpm, as opposed to perhaps 2200-2500 that I was used to. 

Performance Benefits

When it comes down to driving the car hard, this is where this mod shines. The long gearing of the standard diff always made the car seem lazy even under wide-open throttle and the acceleration seemed uneventful. Red line in third gear would see the other end of 150km/h, and that means you never really get the feeling of winding the car out fully. With the shorter diff, there is much more fun factor. The car accelerates through the gears quicker, and this adds a new level of excitement to the car that wasn’t present before. I feel that acceleration in 2nd and 3rd gear is now much more satisfying. I also have much more confidence now that when I mash the throttle from a low speed in second gear, the car will lurch forward with authority. This is useful for those low speed traffic maneuvers which need a short burst of quick acceleration. 

I do feel that the ‘poor man’s supercharger’ moniker is an exaggeration. While the difference is noticeable and a lot more exciting when driven hard, the car is not significantly faster. When driven slowly around town, its actually a bit more tiresome as you have to change gears more often in traffic situations. One must not lose sight of the fact that changing the rear differential does not change the nature of the power delivery of the M54B30. It is still a relatively lazy engine compared to say the B25, and so it’s still not a ‘revvy’ engine with this change. But the shorter diff ratio does improve the feel. 

Fuel Consumption

The fuel consumption is an obvious concern to anyone who might consider this mod. In town situations the fuel consumption is for all intents and purposes, the same. Obviously if you start driving the car harder in town because its more fun, then your fuel consumption will rise, but all things being equal I can’t really tell a difference. On the open road, I do feel there is a difference. Previously the best I could get on a certain stretch was 6.4L/100km. I repeated the same test and the best I can get now is 7.2L/100km. These are of course in ideal situations, overall I feel that highway consumption is compromised by about 1-1.5L/100km. It’s not a huge difference, but it is one that should be considered. 

Final Thoughts

For me personally, the jury is still out on this mod. The benefits are clear, but it’s not without compromise. Because the car is my daily driver, and I prefer to drive in a relaxed manner day-to-day, I find that the extra gear changing at low speeds unnecessary and a little annoying. However, when I do choose to drive the car hard, I enjoy the car more than before. There is also a theoretical part of me that hates that the car is not as fuel efficient as it could be on the highway. 

To some people, the compromises might be irrelevant, to others they might matter a great deal. I would evaluate how often you drive in a spirited manner and compare this with how often you drive in traffic or on the open road. If you have regular opportunities to push the car hard, then this mod is worthwhile. If however you are mostly driving in slow speed traffic or cruising on the highway, then it’s probably better to stick with the original 2.93. 

Summary

Pros
  • Added fun factor and excitement during spirited driving, 
  • More satisfying in-gear acceleration - car is less lethargic at low speeds
Cons
  • Need to change gears more often in slow speed traffic
  • Decrease in highway fuel consumption
 

Woodies

Well-known member
Keep these threads coming! Thanks for sharing such useful info in a detailed and fantastic way


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Yuben

Senior Moderator
Staff member
Firstly as mentioned above but might be lost in the review is that this conversion is best suited to the 6 speed box and not the 5 speed box although both have the 2.93 diff in Stock form.

I tend to disagree with the review above. Speaking from experience I had the 3.38 diff on my 6 speed for the better part of 4 years.

Yes I do have to change quicker in town driving but that is the best part of all. It is so easy to go from 1 to 3 to 5 to 6. That's the beauty of it. Taking speed bumps in 4th gear and yet still having the torque available to ease away after that. Also when turning at an intersection you can easily take it in 4th gear as well.

My fuel consumption improved in town driving due to being able to get into higher gears much faster. Just take off and before u know it , u r in the 6th.

In terms of highway cruising which I hardly did, if I have to compare, from JHB to Durban with the 3.38 I averaged 7.4L/km, and with 2.93 I averaged 7.2L/km. Much of a muchness over long distance. But I dropped from 11.7L/km to 10.2L/km in my town driving which is daily.

So for me that is a huge plus.

And in terms of performance, I tested against a stock 6 speed in JHB and the gap was considerable so the diff definitely makes a diff(excuse the pun:rollsmile:)

I would highly recommend this mod to the 6 speed E46 330i drivers.
:cartel:
 

AdiS

Well-known member
YUBEN@TheFanatics said:
Firstly as mentioned above but might be lost in the review is that this conversion is best suited to the 6 speed box and not the 5 speed box although both have the 2.93 diff in Stock form.

I tend to disagree with the review above. Speaking from experience I had the 3.38 diff on my 6 speed for the better part of 4 years.

Yes I do have to change quicker in town driving but that is the best part of all. It is so easy to go from 1 to 3 to 5 to 6. That's the beauty of it. Taking speed bumps in 4th gear and yet still having the torque available to ease away after that. Also when turning at an intersection you can easily take it in 4th gear as well.

My fuel consumption improved in town driving due to being able to get into higher gears much faster. Just take off and before u know it , u r in the 6th.

In terms of highway cruising which I hardly did, if I have to compare, from JHB to Durban with the 3.38 I averaged 7.4L/km, and with 2.93 I averaged 7.2L/km. Much of a muchness over long distance. But I dropped from 11.7L/km to 10.2L/km in my town driving which is daily.

So for me that is a huge plus.

And in terms of performance, I tested against a stock 6 speed in JHB and the gap was considerable so the diff definitely makes a diff(excuse the pun:rollsmile:)

I would highly recommend this mod to the 6 speed E46 330i drivers.
:cartel:

It sounds like the compromises were neither noticeable nor a detraction for you, hence the mod was the right choice for you.
 

Yuben

Senior Moderator
Staff member
What compromises?
An ever so slight increase in highway consumption?
For me the amount of pros definitely outweighed the one con I had.
 

AdiS

Well-known member
YUBEN@TheFanatics said:
What compromises?
An ever so slight increase in highway consumption?
For me the amount of pros definitely outweighed the one con I had.

Like I said, it sounds like it was the right choice for you.
 

Zound

///Member
A great objective write up. Thank you AdiS.

Another consideration that must be made is that of altitude. Correct me if I am wrong, but AdiS resides in the Western Cape at approximately sea level whereas Yuben resides in Gauteng approximately 1400m above sea level. Naturally aspirated cars lose somewhere in the region of 15% of their rated power because of the reduced oxygen levels. Subsequently, naturally aspirated cars at altitude already feel sluggish in comparison to performance at sea level and perhaps the diff swop mod may prove even more attractive to those at altitude, and perhaps even attain different performance comparative data (acceleration and fuel consumption) to that at sea level.
 

Yuben

Senior Moderator
Staff member
Doubt that Bro since the resultant loss will be the same whether you have a 330i at the coast with the stock diff compared to a 330i with stock diff at altitude and if it was with the 3.38 diff.
 

Gizmo

Banned
I run a 3.62 ratio on my 330i and a 3.73 on my 328i, both cars are running 6spd boxes and I find the best way to cruise with a short ratio diff is to skip gears. I tend to alternate between going 1st 3rd 5th 6th when on level ground or going up hill and going 2nd 4th 6th on downhills. If I want to accelerate fast then i wind through all the gears. Sure fuel consumption is a little worse on the freeway but you don't need to downshift to overtake, just stay in 6th and bury the throttle. I do most of my driving off freeways so it doesn't bother me that the rpms are slightly higher cruising at 120.

Something to consider is bmws are designed to be fuel efficient on autobahns where speeds are in excess of 200km/h and that's why they all have stupidly low diff ratios. Here in S.A. our speed limit is 120km/h so there is no need for a tall ratio so why not convert engine speed into in-gear acceleration and make the car more lively from 0-120km where our cars spend all their time.
 

Yuben

Senior Moderator
Staff member
Gizmo@GARAGE46 said:
I run a 3.62 ratio on my 330i and a 3.73 on my 328i, both cars are running 6spd boxes and I find the best way to cruise with a short ratio diff is to skip gears. I tend to alternate between going 1st 3rd 5th 6th when on level ground or going up hill and going 2nd 4th 6th on downhills. If I want to accelerate fast then i wind through all the gears. Sure fuel consumption is a little worse on the freeway but you don't need to downshift to overtake, just stay in 6th and bury the throttle. I do most of my driving off freeways so it doesn't bother me that the rpms are slightly higher cruising at 120.

Something to consider is bmws are designed to be fuel efficient on autobahns where speeds are in excess of 200km/h and that's why they all have stupidly low diff ratios. Here in S.A. our speed limit is 120km/h so there is no need for a tall ratio so why not convert engine speed into in-gear acceleration and make the car more lively from 0-120km where our cars spend all their time.
:clapper::clapper::clapper:
 

Fordkoppie

///Member
Great review:clapper:

AdiS said:
I do feel that the ‘poor man’s supercharger’ moniker is an exaggeration. While the difference is noticeable and a lot more exciting when driven hard, the car is not significantly faster.

On this matter.....
We have tested 2 different types of cars before and after changing diff ratios, and in both cases, the shorter diff made absolutely NO DIFFERENCE in all out acceleration.

What would happen is that the car with the short diff would edge ahead by a meter or 2 initially, but then have to shift earlier. As soon as the car with the short ratio shifts, the other car which is still in the same gear catches up or would sometimes even pass. Then the tall ratio car would have to change gear, and falls back a little by the same amount as initially. But on a rolling run from 20 - 220 there is nothing in it.

It only feels faster, because it has the effect of being in a higher gear all the time.
Because it "feels" faster, the car is more fun to drive.

The only benefit with the shorter gearing was when both cars are at 60 in 4th gear for instance..... Accelerating from there in the same gear, the car with the shorter diff would out accelerate the one with the taller ratio.
 

ChrisBrand

Staff - Legal
Staff member
I have a 3.46 diff with a 5 speed box. Although not ideal for everyone I have no problem with it. Having the car drive at 140 in 5th and being able to plant your foot to overtake is great. I do however miss that extra gear and would advise going with a 6 speed box.

As to the constant changing of gears, its negligible over stock.
 

moranor@axis

///Member
Official Advertiser
I have a 3.38 ratio in mine overall really dont see myself ever going back

WRT traffic driving I find it better in very heavy traffic because you can crawl at a much lower speed when needed in 1st without having to use the clutch to match traffic speed

I have had a 3.38 diff for so long now really cant comment on the extra gear changes because i cant remember what it was like but was test driving alot of e46s recently because the missus wanted one and most definitely felt better getting back into mine after :rollsmile:
 

Gizmo

Banned
For me I feel a benefit on the race track as the shorter diff ratio spaces 3rd 4th and 5th closer together as those are my primary gears on track. Obviously 1st and 2nd gear are going to rocket you off a startline quicker than the tall ratio diff car.
Fordkoppie, your tests were rolling start. Off the line the short ratio will pull a gap and maintain it until she runs out of gears. Remember a shorter ratio sacrifices engine revolutions to increase the torque at the wheels, that's why its a torque multiplier. You sacrificing overall top speed for acceleration.
 

tman

Well-known member
Awesome detailed write up! We need more informative threads like this! Hats of to you sir! :clapper:
 

AdiS

Well-known member
Thanks for all the contributions to the discussion. I think it's very evident that the pro's and con's of this mod vary according to individual preference. To some, the cons that I mentioned are a complete non-issue, to others they may actually be noticeable and matter.

So far no one that I am aware of has regretted the mod, and neither do I for that matter. On the specific issue of gear changing, I feel that the 1 - 3 - 5 gear-skipping sequence doesn't suit me as those gears are still quite far apart on the 3.38 for my specific driving style. That is simply my opinion, and it is something that one would need to evaluate for his- or herself as to whether it's a bother or not.

Otherwise I reiterate my aforementioned pro's in that the car is a lot more fun, and the acceleration a much more satisfying experience with the shorter diff.
 
Top