Rooi_Willie said:That's some cool info! :ty:
Wonder how the weight of replica csl's compare to oem csl's?
Philip Foglar said:Yep, unsprung weight (as little as possible) is important for overall handling. Then try and achieve this with heavy RFT's! :nonono:
ASH said:on the otherhand are lightweight rims more susceptable to pothole damage and cracking? Eg. the 19" Sport rims on the E92, with the ultra low profile RFT tyres, these are know to crack at the rear, for no reason?
Philip Foglar said:ASH said:on the otherhand are lightweight rims more susceptable to pothole damage and cracking? Eg. the 19" Sport rims on the E92, with the ultra low profile RFT tyres, these are know to crack at the rear, for no reason?
Well yes, this is the tricky part, especially when you throw RFT's into the mix! And those 19" E92 Sport rims are known to crack easily! :nonono:
ASH said:on the otherhand are lightweight rims more susceptable to pothole damage and cracking? Eg. the 19" Sport rims on the E92, with the ultra low profile RFT tyres, these are know to crack at the rear, for no reason?
ASH said:Also interesting to note is that the E46 CSL rims (OEM) are heavier than the stock 19s, I thought the whole concept of CSL was coupe, sport, light so that the cars weight would be reduced as much as possible in all areas, looks like the rims where overlooked. Maybe the engineers used heavy wheels on the CSL for better weight distribution, but its a bit confusing, in relation to the whole CSL concept???