Looking to purchase E90

SylisM

///Member
Ashiel said:
cOlDFuSiOn said:
sash said:
Theres a guy on the facebook group getting 2.5l/100km on his e90 320i, so all of us must be doing something wrong... lol

While it's idling right? :tiptoe:

Dude i dont even get that consumption when my car is switched off :skit:

Sheesh 2.5l/100km:skit: thats... I dont even know what to call it.
 
SylisM said:
Ashiel said:
cOlDFuSiOn said:
sash said:
Theres a guy on the facebook group getting 2.5l/100km on his e90 320i, so all of us must be doing something wrong... lol

While it's idling right? :tiptoe:

Dude i dont even get that consumption when my car is switched off :skit:

Sheesh 2.5l/100km:skit: thats... I dont even know what to call it.

I once got 2.5l/100km on my 3.6 v6...... Then I woke up. Dreaming after you went to bed pissed is awesome, ok only sometimes :rollsmile:
 

osiris

///Member
330i or 320d all the way.

320i is a massive heavy car with a tiny engine that is better suited for a polo, it makes very little torque so you will be pushing that accelerator down all the way allot of the time which means higher fuel consumption.

320d has awesome torque, sounds like a tractor but you get over it, you can feather the throttle in most circumstances and when you want to overtake the power is there.

330i has the torque and the top end power and because of this makes it a pleasure to drive in most conditions, Plus it has a beautiful engine and exhaust note.

323i and 325i are 6 pot but always just feel like they are missing something when you put your foot down, They also use a bit more fuel in city driving conditions due to less torque than the 330i.
 

waseemessop

New member
Dirtydeedsman said:
Sorry to hijack the thread here but what about fuel consumption. I know it is driver dependent and car's condition etc but surely the reason one would be aiming for a 320i and not the 6 pot Beemas is because they are heavier on juice even though they have better power output.

i own a 320i e90 auto 2012- trust me bud, if i had read up earlier, i would have def. gone the 6 pod way.

my car averages 11.2 combined.
 

MrDC

New member
I hear a 323i is just a detuned 325i. Or is there more to it than just "tuning"? Do mechanical parts physically need to be upgraded or computer chip upgraded?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

akash

Well-known member
MrDC said:
I hear a 323i is just a detuned 325i. Or is there more to it than just "tuning"? Do mechanical parts physically need to be upgraded or computer chip upgraded?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It more than just tuning.

The intake design is a bit different and the exhaust manifold i believe is smaller in diameter.
 

husaindindar

///Member
Uhhm surprising nobody mentioned that the 323/325 and in some cases the 330 can have major oil consumption issues.

Some guys reported 1 lite per 1000km!

I think the N52 is a 2 stroke engine :roflol:

But damn, I dont care what it runs on. These are the last NA engines out of BMW.
That induction and exhaust sing the songs from heaven...
 

Dirtydeedsman

Active member
Besides the visual differences between the Pre LCI and the LCI are there any changes to the mechanics or any revisions that made the LCI even better?
 

tyronzn

New member
Dirtydeedsman said:
Besides the visual differences between the Pre LCI and the LCI are there any changes to the mechanics or any revisions that made the LCI even better?


Not sure but I do know that there are engine differences between the 320d's, LCI has the newer N47 engine whereas the pre LCI has the M47TU2 engine. The N47 has more power and better fuel economy. Other than looks I don't know of any other differences
 

NtandoN

///Member
Consider expanding your shopping list. If you want a 6 pot look at the 330i as well but if you're concerned about fuel consumption, add the 320d and 330d to your list. The power figures on the diesels are incredible.

Anyway, I suppose it depends on what you want.
320i - comfortable, luxury vehicle but lacks power :nono: :bin:
323i - great engine note but not fuel efficient and lacks power for a 6 cylinder :pfft:
325i - satisfactory power and great engine note, not fuel efficient :argh:
330i - powerful and great engine/exhaust note, not fuel efficient :excited:

320d - satisfactory power and great fuel efficiency, but that tractor sound :shakehead: (tuning potential)
330d - powerful and fuel efficient :thumbsup: (great tuning potential)

If it was my money, I would definitely get a 330d.
 

DuckKnuckle

Member
I have a 2006 325i if you're interested.

I've replaced a lot of components on the car already, including valve stem seals and the vanos.

Sent from my SM-N910H using Tapatalk
 

Lizzard

Active member
we are just giving the OP some info regarding all the cars and their individual positive and negative sides so he (maybe a she, dont know) can decide and see what the risk is with each.

Plus we are driving these cars so it's not info coming from a toyota or VW guy :rollsmile:
 

Nick

Honorary ///Member
my dad has a 323 and i have a 320i.

My consumption - between 7.9 and 9.0 depending on how much of an ass i am. My car has 146k on it and has had a valve cover gasket replaced and a vbelt roller and thats it.

My dads - stays at 8.2 he is a rep and has driven the car from 69k up to 280k without a days issue, only fuel and tyres.
 

Nick

Honorary ///Member
If speed is the only thing you base a car on then get a 335i or an M car.
If you want to drive to work and to buy milk and biltong then any other BMW will be fine.
 

xavier

New member
Get a 323i and decat the exhaust car has a nice silent roar and it pulls much better than a stock 323i....I decatted my brothers 323i motorsport

Sent from my D2403 using Tapatalk
 
Top