RR001
Banned
DieselFan said:The 320d is faster than the 320i.
And you got this factual information from ?
:blab:
No one is mentioning what a temperamental car the X35s are ???
If no motorplan , goodluck
:bangdesk:
DieselFan said:The 320d is faster than the 320i.
RR001 said:DieselFan said:The 320d is faster than the 320i.
And you got this factual information from ?
:blab:
RR001 said:DieselFan said:The 320d is faster than the 320i.
And you got this factual information from ?
:blab:
No one is mentioning what a temperamental car the X35s are ???
If no motorplan , goodluck
:bangdesk:
Vicus said:RR001 said:DieselFan said:The 320d is faster than the 320i.
And you got this factual information from ?
:blab:
No one is mentioning what a temperamental car the X35s are ???
If no motorplan , goodluck
:bangdesk:
Having driven both, I can tell you that there is just about nothing to choose between the two as far as pure performance in the sense of acceleration and top speed is concerned. They are so closely matched that the skill of the driver will probably determine who wins any type of race.
The WAY the power is delivered is vastly different though. It just depends on your point of view which you will enjoy more.
For me and other diesel fans the diesel power delivery feels smooth and effortless and refined. Especially when overtaking at medium cruising speeds 120-160, the diesel feels especially lively, accelerating so effortessly and powerfully that that the driver has to be really disciplined to not drive at speeds which could possibly get him into serious trouble with the law.
The "i" fans will say that they don't enjoy the low revs. I still don't quite understand that....but hey let's humour them.
To me the "i" feels like it is labouring to match the "d", like the engine has to work double as hard. It does not have the "effortless" feel of the "d".
Sort of conjures the image in my mind of a 50cc 2 stroke motorcycle "screaming" down the road at 90 km/h.
I don't really get people preferring the "i" because of revs. We are talking luxury sedan here. Compared to cheaper cars, the feel is quieter ad more refined. It's not like the "i"'s motor har any "grand prix" like sound or feel. You dont get to "feel" the revs anyway.
To diesel haters the "d" feels dead because there is no sense of "revs" or effort from the engine, to diesel fans the "i" seems to be working it's proverbial "ass" off just to keep up. In the end performance is the same.
The "d" is a lot lighter on fuel, but costs more....so I guess each to his own....
putting words in the mouths of "i" owners
I have seen a couple of times." low revving diesel :yuck:"
Vicus said:putting words in the mouths of "i" owners
Yeah, I get what you are saying. But we actually had the "revs" argument in numerous posts now, where "i" fans/owners express this sentiment.
I have seen a couple of times." low revving diesel :yuck:"
Gbmw said:Vicus said:putting words in the mouths of "i" owners
Yeah, I get what you are saying. But we actually had the "revs" argument in numerous posts now, where "i" fans/owners express this sentiment.
I have seen a couple of times." low revving diesel :yuck:"
Oh...my bad then :=):, did not know u had reference. Easy then :thumbs:
Gbmw said:yeah I hear you, just different strokes for folks. Look I think deep inside diesel is better....for someone else that is :rollsmile:. My Boet has a X5 30.D, my ex had the E91 320d touring, Pop's 730d and ol'lady E60 530d. So in honesty I know from driving them that the are somewhat better (in my opinion) especially the fact that when I had my E60 530i I could direct compare with my moms E60 530D.
BUT..... I just can't bring myself to OWN a diesel....sooooooooooooo "i's" are better!! :tease:
Vicus said:I must say the thing that gets to me a bit is that invariably when I speak to someone who is considering buying a 320i, and I ask them why not the "d" ? They usually say that they have this or that dislike of diesels.
So far so good, no problem. Then I suggest they just for the "hell-of-it" test drive a "d'". And just about every single time they don't. That is a bit frustrating. How can you compare or have an opinion if you have never even driven the car?
On the one occasion someone (a colleague) did test the "d" (by taking a spin in mine), the response was very predictable: " a few minutes of driving in stunned silence. Then "shit....bloody hell...I see now what you mean..."
You test both and you still prefer the "i"....then sure...go for it. It's not gnna happen often though.
Gbmw said:Vicus said:putting words in the mouths of "i" owners
Yeah, I get what you are saying. But we actually had the "revs" argument in numerous posts now, where "i" fans/owners express this sentiment.
I have seen a couple of times." low revving diesel :yuck:"
Oh...my bad then :=):, did not know u had reference. Easy then :thumbs:
Meh....no bad of yours :=):
Freedom of speech, I say. :rollsmile:
SP33DYV said:Devon, just remember one thing, it will never sound like a six cylinder.
But it will almost run with your 330i and will use less fuel.
:idea:
Rather look for a late model e90 335i. Will cost you similar money.
My 2 cents.
Iceman007 said:Ok like i say proof is in the pudding and all the F30 320i Ihave taken on since I have my 320d from robot to robot they just stay behind.