rick540 said:Compared to the 4.0 and 4.4 V8's I have owned they are not thirsty at all.
In a mixed cycle town highway and morning traffic I get 12.8L/100 which for a 20 yo 3.6, 232Kw engine is actually very, very good.
If one really uses the power it doesnt go above 16L/100
rick540 said:Compared to the 4.0 and 4.4 V8's I have owned they are not thirsty at all.
In a mixed cycle town highway and morning traffic I get 12.8L/100 which for a 20 yo 3.6, 232Kw engine is actually very, very good.
If one really uses the power it doesnt go above 16L/100
rick540 said:Compared to the 4.0 and 4.4 V8's I have owned they are not thirsty at all.
In a mixed cycle town highway and morning traffic I get 12.8L/100 which for a 20 yo 3.6, 232Kw engine is actually very, very good.
If one really uses the power it doesnt go above 16L/100
Tks for that link.....makes interesting reading. Not that far off what the std '93 525iT's are returning, might be worth it for the increase in 'towing' ability.Clownshoe said:Fuely M5 figures
Fuely is the best depositry of fuel consumption figures.
Average of about 12.5 l/100km
635_wes said:rick540 said:Compared to the 4.0 and 4.4 V8's I have owned they are not thirsty at all.
In a mixed cycle town highway and morning traffic I get 12.8L/100 which for a 20 yo 3.6, 232Kw engine is actually very, very good.
If one really uses the power it doesnt go above 16L/100
You are my heroraise:
How do u manage to achieve those figures?