saturnz said:
It is not my fault that you took the high road.
The fact that I mentioned the car was reviewed in the Top Car magazine should have been sufficient, and the fact that no-one else questioned my statement.
:spit:
You seriously need stop being so serious. I took no "high road". You posted a single line mentioning the IS Turbo which rang a bell with me, but after hearing so many different stories about the IS it's become natural for me to be skeptic. I never said you were wrong or insinuated that you were. Clearly it exists... I never claimed it didn't. I merely stated that I was skeptic... or maybe a better word would 'unsure'. I genuinely forgot about the CAR articles. They were posted in 2007. And I seriously couldn't find anything with Google. I asked more than once for anyone with info to please post it.
You didn't post anything to validate any of your statements. Mentioning a review doesn't mean anything. You don't even seem sure it was in Top Car. The fact that no-one else questioned you is merely because they either didn't know or were unsure themselves. I was unsure and that's why I questioned it.
I also want to be sure that the right info is posted. This is the internet and the internet is full of false information posted by people that make stuff up or people that believe something to be true when it's not. If nobody questioned what others put on the net... well... you could only imagine.
Now I have one more question. From the article above, it seems that the Alpine Turbo conversion is something that you as the owner of the car could have had done. It doesn't say that BMW brought them out the factory or sold them like that... or did they? If they didn't, then how can it be factory fitted? :thinking:
If someone has a proper explanation, then please post before I get accused for taking some "high road" again.