P1000 said:You do realize that the 70000:1 contrast ratio is not realistically achievable in real life? And it will be closer to 700-1000:1. Check reviews. Specs on LCDs are not regulated and usually a load of BS. I have measured monitors with claimed 2ms response times to be closer to 20-25ms. The best thing to use is your eyes when choosing a display. But I agree, 3d is way too expensive VS its usefullness at the moment. If you buy one now, in a years time a new one with the same or better specs will cost half of what you paid....
Contrast ratio in a read room said:In marketing literature, contrast ratios for emissive (as opposed to reflective) displays are always measured under the optimum condition of a room in total darkness. In typical viewing situations the contrast ratio is significantly lower due to the reflection of light from the surface of the display, making it harder to distinguish between different devices with very high contrast ratios.[4] How much the room light reduces the contrast ratio depends on the luminance of the display, as well as the amount of light reflecting off the display.[5]
A clean print at a typical movie theater may have a contrast ratio of 500:1[6] Dynamic contrast ratio is usually measured at factory with two panels (one vs another) of the same model as each panel will have an inherent Dark and Light (Hot) spot. Static is usually measured with the same screen showing half screen full bright vs half screen full dark. This usually results in a lower ratio as brightness will creep into the dark area of the screen thus giving a higher luminance.