NBN said:
It wasn't called the poor man's M3 for no reason.... 90% of the performance at a fraction of the price( figuratively speaking)
I strongly disagree with this, and I’ve owned both at the same time for a few years.
The two cars have *fundamentally* different characters, and the performance difference
Is significant.
The 330i is the most wonderful daily driver. It’s comfortable, but handles well, torquey and smooth, but brisk enough not to be frustrating. It is however, not very exciting or involving to drive, especially when compared to the m3. It’s a really well balanced car for daily driving duties.
The m3 feels super connected and engaging to drive - it’s *much* more of an experience. But it’s a bit tiresome in town, and everything is just more effort than the 330i which becomes quite apparent if it’s used daily.
The thing I don’t like about my 330i is mostly the throttle response. It’s crap. And don’t tell me it’s because it’s electronic, the m3 shows that an electronic throttle can be brilliant. But the 330i was designed to have a lethargic throttle response and it’s annoying.
The only other criticism I have is that the car is generally quite sedate in character. This is a much more minor criticism, and to be honest it’s probably appropriate for the intended purpose of the car, but I do wish the engine had more sound higher up in the revs, and that the acceleration felt a little more urgent.
These are very minor things, and there are *very few* cars (new or used) that I would trade my 330i for as a daily. The design, the sound, the build quality add up to such a brilliant package.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk