Breaking News - G11 7-Series in the flesh!

AshG108

///Member
I like it...like it quite a bit...much better styling on the rear...and the front will grow on you for sure:rollsmile:
 

Hugo_za

Well-known member
2016-BMW-7-Series-Photo-Leak.jpg


2016-BMW-7-Series-Photo-Leak-1.jpg


2016-BMW-7-Series-Photo-Leak-2.jpg


2016-BMW-7-Series-Photo-Leak-3.jpg


2016-BMW-7-Series-Photo-Leak-6.jpg


2016-BMW-7-Series-Photo-Leak-8.jpg


2016-BMW-7-Series-Photo-Leak-9.jpg


2016-BMW-7-Series-Photo-Leak-10.jpg


Loving the dual sunroofs and the pathway lighting.
 

cust1234

Member
To be honest, can't say that I'm too impressed. Was hoping for more, I think the new S Class was definitely ground breaking in it's appearance - maybe that's just me.

It certainly isn't bad but I think it's more of a missed opportunity than anything. I'm sure it will drive great though... Perhaps all the leaks of low quality pictures so far has tainted it for me...
 

Hugo_za

Well-known member
Personally I find the 7-er (and in fact, most BMWs) to be more masculine than its Mercedes counterpart. The interior of the G11 is certainly a big step up for BMW in terms of perceived quality (quilted leather, etc) and there certainly is no shortage of tech.

I watched a very honest review of the S-Class yesterday in which the reviewer said "you dont need a large wallet to buy an S-Class, you need a degree in engineering". He also went on to say that when you press the "menu" button on the AC Control Strip you will take the next couple of afternoons figuring out all the settings. The same apparently goes for the rest of the new COMAND system. It consists of layer on top of layers and yet more layers. It is almost as though Merc is going through what BMW went through with the E65, which is making the simplest of tasks unnecessarily complicated.

Hopefully BMW has taken heed of consumer complaints and made iDrive simpler to use than it's current iteration.

Time will tell :)
 

Sankekur

///Member
Hugo_za said:

This seems like a really bad idea, firstly laser light is not very good as a light source due to its coherency and secondly coherent light poses the risk of causing permanent eye damage.
 

Hugo_za

Well-known member
Sankekur said:
Hugo_za said:

This seems like a really bad idea, firstly laser light is not very good as a light source due to its coherency and secondly coherent light poses the risk of causing permanent eye damage.

It's actually quite interesting how they transform the laser into a viable light source.


Sent from Tapatalk, iPhone 6 Plus.
 

Sankekur

///Member
Hugo_za said:
Sankekur said:
Hugo_za said:

This seems like a really bad idea, firstly laser light is not very good as a light source due to its coherency and secondly coherent light poses the risk of causing permanent eye damage.

It's actually quite interesting how they transform the laser into a viable light source.


Sent from Tapatalk, iPhone 6 Plus.

I would recon they use three different lasers (red green and blue) and a three colour x-prism to combine the light in order to get white light, as you don't get white laser light.
They probably also have one or more time-varying field homogenisers to destroy the coherency of the lasers......though then technically you can no longer call it laser light, then it is just narrow band light. In this case they probably have one for each colour as the interfence pattern for each with source will be different.
Then there is probably filter(s) or light-tube(s) to correct the light distribution.
Hopefully they managed to dust-proof these lights (unlike the lights on previous models) as dust and lasers are not friends.
 

Hugo_za

Well-known member
Sankekur said:
Hugo_za said:
Sankekur said:
Hugo_za said:

This seems like a really bad idea, firstly laser light is not very good as a light source due to its coherency and secondly coherent light poses the risk of causing permanent eye damage.

It's actually quite interesting how they transform the laser into a viable light source.


Sent from Tapatalk, iPhone 6 Plus.

I would recon they use three different lasers (red green and blue) and a three colour x-prism to combine the light in order to get white light, as you don't get white laser light.
They probably also have one or more time-varying field homogenisers to destroy the coherency of the lasers......though then technically you can no longer call it laser light, then it is just narrow band light. In this case they probably have one for each colour as the interfence pattern for each with source will be different.
Then there is probably filter(s) or light-tube(s) to correct the light distribution.
Hopefully they managed to dust-proof these lights (unlike the lights on previous models) as dust and lasers are not friends.

Here you go: http://auto.howstuffworks.com/laser-powered-headlight.htm


Sent from Tapatalk, iPhone 6 Plus.
 

uncle j

///Member
cOlDFuSiOn said:
Hugo_za said:
cOlDFuSiOn said:
Looks interesting :coolShake:

BUT... What's with the huge fender gaps? It's as high as a 4x4.. Not cool.. Needs to be slammed.. :cartel:

This particular 730d was running on smaller than usual rims.

They look like 18s yes, but even from the height on the side shot the car is too high for my taste, but this is the standard model too, the M-Sport should look amazing I think! :praise:

Hi the reason it is so high is because they fit transport spacers in the suspension while they get transported. Once at the dealer they get removed and the gap is reduced.

J


I have driven it and it is loaded with technology, even has an option for laser headlights. awesome vehicle, miles ahead of the competition.

J


It also has gesture control wereby you just rotate your finger clock or anti clockwise to raise or lower the volume.

J
 

adamr

Well-known member
I saw a video on this car showing off the tech. Really am impressed with the technology in this car

Sent from my S6 Edge+
 
Top