320d vs 330d datalogs

phantom

Member
Last year I owned the e90320d and e9033odlci.This year i have the f30 on both. The F30 cars are 8speed auto whereas e90 was 6 speed auto. Its always good to do logs straight after each other but in this case not possible.I do however keep all my logs so a comparison can be made. You will notice that for persons that speed is not important the 320d is capable on the lower speed, but higher up the difference becomes massive.
e90320d ... f30320d .. e90lci330d ... f30330d
60ft 3.4sec ... 2.53sec .. 2.29sec .. 2.23sec
200mts 10.2sec .. 10.1sec .. 9.19sec ... 9.03sec
402mts 15.8sec . 15.7sec .. 14.29sec .. 13.93sec
800mts 166km/h... 170km/h .. 193km/h.... 197km/h
1000mts 176km/h .. 179km/h . 208km/h.... 209km/h
80-120 5.6sec .. 5.2sec .. 3.1sec ... 2.7sec
60-160 16.8sec.. 16.4sec.... 10.9sec..... 9.6sec
100-200 33.0sec.. 32.03sec.... 17.3sec .... 16.6sec

:thumbs:
 

phantom

Member
DieselFanBoy said:
And with ppk?

The only difference worthwile on the ppk is the 60ft that has come down to the 1.6 to 1.8second average.
The rest i am waiting for an explanation from BMW SA and to be quite honest i do not think there is going to be any response.Apparently there is no-one technical to explain on the product.There has been response on my other thread from a 330dppk fitted in the UK and they cannot feel the difference. I thought my problem was altitude based but this is clearly not the problem.I think i wasted my money as i wanted more performance and not high performance brake and 1 row bigger intercooler.:thumbdo:
 

phantom

Member
Astro said:
How does this test compare with equipment such as a vbox.

Doesn't really matter what the figures are as long as all tests are conducted with the same equipment.
I use the Racechrono because of the 12 satelite tracking and is 0.1 sec sensitive. Some of the other types of equipment are only 0.5sec sensitive. :thumbs:
 
Top