I have, near certainly, lost to the dark side. I'm acquiring a tractor. And sticking some paper under the mattress for that pesky turbo. I'm sold on the fuel economy and power/value relationship of the 2litre d. The ride goes without saying.
Since I'm quite new to beemer worship, at least the more ritualistic practicing thereof, I thought I'd seek the counsel of the Sith. I wasn't sure whether this would be best received in the 1ers or 3ers section (bias and all that). So it's in neither.
I'm fairly torn between the E90 320d (looking at a 2006 m sport one) and the E87 120d (also mid 2000s). It seems to my researcher's eye (google) that they are in the same price range.
My question is this - if I'm not planning on lugging around children (or any backseat passengers) or a significant amount of luggage, is the 120d perhaps the better option?
I want an auto that's a great drive and I'm thinking the vastness of the 3 may be wasted on my needs. I do however adore the 3s looks, especially with the M sport pack (nice mags).
I am a bit biased myself - have thrashed a 120d with great joy but never touched a 3 before. I loved the 120d's grippiness and the low, fighter jet cockpit flying position.
My intuition says there's more to a 120d vs 320d debate than rear legroom but I thought I'd start there. I will mostly be carting myself around between Stellenbosch and CT/SSW. Very occasionally a 350km East trip.
I'm in this for medium term - 2-3 years.
TLDR:
Mid 2000's E87 120d or E90 320d.
Any insight from former or current owners and fans (or haters) is hugely appreciated in this time of bmw coming of age.
Since I'm quite new to beemer worship, at least the more ritualistic practicing thereof, I thought I'd seek the counsel of the Sith. I wasn't sure whether this would be best received in the 1ers or 3ers section (bias and all that). So it's in neither.
I'm fairly torn between the E90 320d (looking at a 2006 m sport one) and the E87 120d (also mid 2000s). It seems to my researcher's eye (google) that they are in the same price range.
My question is this - if I'm not planning on lugging around children (or any backseat passengers) or a significant amount of luggage, is the 120d perhaps the better option?
I want an auto that's a great drive and I'm thinking the vastness of the 3 may be wasted on my needs. I do however adore the 3s looks, especially with the M sport pack (nice mags).
I am a bit biased myself - have thrashed a 120d with great joy but never touched a 3 before. I loved the 120d's grippiness and the low, fighter jet cockpit flying position.
My intuition says there's more to a 120d vs 320d debate than rear legroom but I thought I'd start there. I will mostly be carting myself around between Stellenbosch and CT/SSW. Very occasionally a 350km East trip.
I'm in this for medium term - 2-3 years.
TLDR:
Mid 2000's E87 120d or E90 320d.
Any insight from former or current owners and fans (or haters) is hugely appreciated in this time of bmw coming of age.