Post Reply 
Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 4 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Document fees? Really!
24-12-2016, 09:36 PM
Post: #1
Document fees? Really!
I have often wondered about the so-called doc fees. They are R3000 and up these days. Dealers insist that they are not negotiable about this.

In exchange for your hard earned you get a license disc worth about R1000, maybe R200 or R300 worth of fuel and the luxury of not having to spend a few delightful hours at the license department. They do have send their guy there but he is doing several cars at once. Most of the fee seem to be profit for the dealer.

Here is an article about the deplorable state of affairs in the States. Thoughts?

Quote: Dealer Fees Under Attack
Written by Jim Radogna on 02/19/2016

Two recent actions for alleged dealer fee violations in South Carolina and Indiana are a potential cause for concern in other states due to the likelihood of copycat legal actions. While these states had no caps on dealer fees, a private lawsuit in South Carolina resulted in a $3.6 million verdict and an attorney general action in Indiana resulted in a $625K settlement. Both cases alleged that the dealers overcharged customers because their fees did not reflect expenses actually incurred by the dealers for services.

Although the state doesn’t offer guidance on what dealers can charge, the court in South Carolina interpreted “closing fee” to mean a “predetermined set fee for the reimbursement of closing costs, but only those actually incurred by the dealer and necessary to the closing transaction.” Under that interpretation, the court reasoned that the dealer had to provide evidence it calculated the cost comprising its closing fee, which it could not do. Further, a justice stated “Although we agree that the Closing Fee Statute is a disclosure statement and the department serves as a repository for the required filings, we find that the Closing Fee Statute does more than require disclosure of the 'Closing Fee.'”

According to a press release from the office of Indiana attorney general “Under Indiana’s Motor Vehicle Dealer Unfair Practices Act, auto dealers cannot require a motor vehicle purchaser to pay a document preparation fee unless the fee reflects expenses actually incurred for the preparation of documents and was negotiated by and disclosed to the customer.” The dealer was found to have charged doc fees around $479, which the AG ruled was higher than could be justified to cover costs.

Indiana law is more specific than South Carolina as far as the requirement that actual expenses be calculated: “It is an unfair practice for a dealer to require a purchaser of a motor vehicle as a condition of the sale and delivery of the motor vehicle to pay a document preparation fee, unless the fee:

Reflects expenses actually incurred for the preparation of documents;
Was affirmatively disclosed by the dealer;
Was negotiated by the dealer and the purchaser;
Is not for the preparation, handling, or service of documents that are incidental to the extension of credit; and
Is set forth on a buyer’s order or similar agreement by a means other than preprinting.”

Other states, such as Connecticut, have regulations that are similar to South Carolina’s in that they primarily address disclosure of the dealer fee but do not offer guidance on the amount a dealer can charge: “A ‘dealer conveyance fee’ or ‘processing fee’ means a fee charged by a dealer to recover reasonable costs for processing all documentation and performing services related to the closing of a sale, including, but not limited to, the registration and transfer of ownership of the motor vehicle which is the subject of the sale.”

So, in a private lawsuit or AG action in a state like Connecticut, the questions may well be what amount is considered “reasonable” and how are the costs justified?

Although all cases are different, information from the South Carolina court may lend some insight on how to avoid or defend against dealer fee attacks. The following excerpts from the case would seem relevant:

The dealership’s expert witness in the SC case testified that the dealership’s average closing costs, which were $506.96, greatly exceeded the $299 fee the plaintiff paid. But in calculating the average closing cost, he included expenses for the salaries of finance and sales managers, the building, utilities and outside services.” The court disagreed. “All of these are general operating expenses and not directly tied to the closing of motor vehicle sales. If a motor vehicle dealer wishes to be compensated for these expenses, it may include them as part of the overall purchase price of a vehicle.”

The court further opined that the term "cost" in the context of the "Closing Fee" Statute "would refer to the amount of money a dealer is required to expend to perform the services it provides to a customer at closing, and to otherwise comply with the disclosure, documentation, and record retention requirements imposed under state and federal law. While we recognize the difficulty a dealer may face in determining the exact amount of a specific purchaser's closing fee prior to closing, we agree with the trial judge's interpretation that the amount charged must bear some relation to the actual expenses incurred for the closing.”

The court emphasized that a "closing fee" is not limited to expenses incurred for document preparation, retrieval, and storage. However, any costs sought to be recovered by a dealer under a closing fee charge must be directly related to the services rendered and expenses incurred in closing the purchase of a vehicle. Given that each vehicle purchase is different, compliance with the "Closing Fee" Statute does not require that the dealer hit the "bull's-eye" for each purchase. A dealer may comply with the statute by setting a closing fee in an amount that is an average of the costs actually incurred in all closings of the prior year.

Based on the above, some ideas for what may constitute “reasonable costs for processing all documentation and performing services related to the closing of a sale” include:

Processing and submission of credit applications to finance companies*
Preparation of finance or lease documents*
Preparation and submission of vehicle registrations both manually and electronically with the DMV
Filing and releasing security liens on purchased and traded vehicles as contractually required by lending institutions
Processing applications for new or duplicate title documents with the DMV
Processing the pay-off of an existing lien on any vehicle offered in trade
DMS (Dealer Management System) costs to process paperwork
Software such as Dealertrack or RouteOne to investigate credit, print required disclosures, and run Red Flags and OFAC checks
Forms, toner, etc.
Compliance training and auditing costs
Fees to attorneys for vetting documents

* Some states prohibit the inclusion of fees to process loan documents in the dealer fee.


TILA Disclosures - Other lawsuits have claimed that the dealer fee is a finance charge for federal Truth in Lending Act (TILA) disclosure purposes. To avoid this, it’s important to also charge dealer fees on comparable cash transactions. Since you obviously wouldn’t incur credit-related costs listed above on cash transactions, the SC court’s suggested method of averaging the costs in all closings of the prior year would appear to be beneficial.

Negotiation of Dealer Fees – Although a number of state regulations indicate that dealer fees must be negotiated with customers, this raises concerns about potential discrimination claims. The reasoning is that if a dealership charges one customer a fee of any kind they have to charge everyone the same fee, or they open themselves up to a lawsuit.

Another fear is that charging a different dealer fee to different customers is “illegal”. This does not appear to be the case unless state law specifically prohibits dealerships from charging any customer a different doc fee amount than any other customer. The only state of which I’m aware that has such a prohibition is West Virginia. In a 2014 case brought by the West Virginia Automobile & Truck Dealers Association against Ford Motor Company, the court disagreed that charging different doc fees is prohibited by West Virginia Consumer Credit and Protection Act, but agreed that guidance from the West Virginia Motor Vehicle Dealers Advisory Board prohibits dealerships from charging any customer a higher doc fee than any other customer. (Arguably, this is not a violation of WV law and thus not “illegal” per se, but simply guidance from the WVMVDAB who’s “statutory purpose is to assist and to advise the Commissioner of the Division of Motor Vehicles on the administration of laws regulating the motor vehicle industry; to work with the commissioner in developing new laws, rules or policies regarding the motor vehicles industry; and to give the commissioner such further advice and assistance as he or she may from time to time require.” Regardless, WV dealers are bound to follow the Dealer Advisory Board’s directions).

So the easy answer is to just charge everyone the same doc fee, right? Perhaps. But here’s the rub: Conveyance/Processing fees are dealer-imposed charges and therefore not mandatory - only government fees are compulsory. So it is improper to tell a customer that you MUST charge them the fee – this could lead to a deceptive practices claim.

So how do you avoid potential discrimination claims? By being able to show proof that any downward deviations in fees are for valid business reasons. For example, if a manufacturer limits the doc fee for an employee purchase, that reason should be documented in writing and a copy kept in the deal jacket. Another example would be that a competitive dealer offered a lower doc fee that you needed to match to make the deal. Again, documentation is key. This follows the same line of reasoning as NADA’s Fair Credit Compliance Program for rate markups.

The information presented in this article is solely the opinion of the author and is not intended to convey or constitute legal advice, and is not a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney. You should not act upon any such information without first seeking qualified professional counsel on your specific matter.

Present BMWs:
'89 735i Auto
'01 325i Manual
'02 530i Manual
Past BMWs:
'79 520 Manual, '97 328i Manual, '97 528i Auto, '98 318is Manual
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
28-12-2016, 11:39 AM
Post: #2
RE: Document fees? Really!
Yip this is an outright rip off

I recently purchased a car from BMW , the standard fee was R2800 (licence and registration) which I paid for before collection.
i'm from Johannesburg and the car was in Durban.
2 days before collection the salesman informed they didn't have time to register the car for me so I should get it done myself and they will re-imburse me.
I got a que for you shop to do it for me with number plates and was billed R850.

when I enquired if I will be re-imbursed the full amount (R2800), I was told that i will only be reimbursed the amount as per the invoice.
so basically the dealer scored R1950 for jam
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
28-12-2016, 11:49 AM
Post: #3
RE: Document fees? Really!
Its been 3000 for years.

[Image: nick sig2_1674483441.jpg]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
28-12-2016, 11:53 AM
Post: #4
RE: Document fees? Really!
YesNoYesNoYesNo these people get away with it.

2011 120d Coupe (Black - Yin)
2012 125i Coupe (White - Yang)

2009 Z4m Coupe ( found a new home )
07 Audi A4 ( Passed onto father inlaw )
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
28-12-2016, 12:18 PM (This post was last modified: 28-12-2016 12:28 PM by Nick.)
Post: #5
RE: Document fees? Really!
Iv bought cars from the dealer i worked for, still got knocked the 3000.00.

[Image: nick sig2_1674483441.jpg]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
28-12-2016, 03:03 PM (This post was last modified: 28-12-2016 03:04 PM by WyKiD.)
Post: #6
RE: Document fees? Really!
I flat out refuse to pay these fees, if the dealer persists...I advise I will register the the car on my own and fill the tank as well. In the past this usually results in the dealer charging a reasonable fee(around half the initial cost) for the process to which I usually agree to or I refuse to pay and proceed to pay a reliable service provider to do this for me....

/o(O)(O) \ (lllllllll)(lllllllll) / (O)(O)o\
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
28-12-2016, 03:23 PM
Post: #7
RE: Document fees? Really!
Not sure what the documents fees are at Leo Haese Centurion but they always deliver cars with full tanks of fuelClapper

So if you looking to buy a car in-future, you know where to goRollsmileRollsmile
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
28-12-2016, 05:51 PM
Post: #8
RE: Document fees? Really!
This is over and above the kickback they get for instituting finance.

A mate of mine deals in volumes, makes 5k a car if that, but does splendidly well on the kickback+license+reg ect.

I will be on the other side if anybody needs me Bluebiggrin
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
28-12-2016, 09:14 PM
Post: #9
RE: Document fees? Really!
Only fools pay these excessive fees!
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 

User(s) browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

Return to TopReturn to Content